Teams

GOLDMAN TC CW5.5A

2024 COMBO · Women 5.5

17 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
3.12
Kelly Alberta
published
3.09
Anny Hong
published 3
3.07
Hsing-Hsien Wang
published 3
3.05
Molly Shiels
published
2.92
Amy Chin
published 3
2.90
Mary Kane
published
Hannah de Groot
published 3
2.73
Elizabeth Kao
published 2.5
2.73
Mimi Nguyen
published
2.71
Alyson Murphy
published 3
2.71
Charlene Scheil
published 3
2.67
Ann Capitan
published 3
2.59
Jeri Chu
published
2.53
Amy Gregg
published 3
2.18
Amy Ashcroft
published 2.5
Nicole Murphy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Pfannenstiel + Kelly Alberta6261% games+3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Pfannenstiel
19W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.18
Kelly Alberta
27W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Anny Hong
23W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Hsing-Hsien Wang
18W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.07
Molly Shiels
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Amy Chin
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.92
Mary Kane
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Hannah de Groot
0W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Elizabeth Kao
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%4%96%
2.73
Mimi Nguyen
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Alyson Murphy
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Charlene Scheil
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Ann Capitan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
2.67
Jeri Chu
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
2.59
3
Amy Gregg
7W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
2.53
2.5
Amy Ashcroft
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.18
Nicole Murphy
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.