Teams

Wexford

Adult Team Tennis · HHI Team Tennis

21 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · HHI Team Tennis
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CPAcers000000
2SC Yacht Club000000
3Wexford000000
4South Beach Mixed Nuts000000
5HHTT/Tyson/Spring Lake000000
6Port Royal Players000000
7LC Kiss My Ace000000
8Shipyard SuperShots000000
9SPCC No Faults000000
10PBT000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Cynthia Duvall
published 4
3.50
Susan Geist
published
3.27
Julie Holycross
published
3.23
Susan Minter
published
3.18
Midge Crist
published
3.17
Ashley Halloran
published 3.5
3.13
Les Jones
published
3.09
Paul Halloran
published
2.98
Doug Watson
published
2.96
Gilliane Mossing
published
2.93
Deborah Lasota
published 3.5
2.81
Ed Bilthouse
published
2.81
Jaime Seale
published
2.79
Drew Seale
published
2.77
Kimberly Foster
published
2.66
Cheryl Hahn
published 3
2.60
Laura Levine
published
2.53
Jan Bilthouse
published
2.52
Connie Watson
published 3
2.39
Karen Hites
published
Marion Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Les Jones + Drew Seale134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Minter + Deborah Lasota123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Minter + Marion Brown213 matchesnot enough data
Midge Crist + Deborah Lasota213 matchesnot enough data
Connie Watson + Jan Bilthouse123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cynthia Duvall
64W–42L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.64
Susan Geist
47W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
Julie Holycross
48W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.27
Susan Minter
30W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Midge Crist
28W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
3.5
Ashley Halloran
15W–12L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Les Jones
13W–11L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Paul Halloran
11W–11L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Doug Watson
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Gilliane Mossing
20W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3.5
Deborah Lasota
14W–38L career · no lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.93
Ed Bilthouse
7W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Jaime Seale
12W–17L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Drew Seale
19W–14L career · no lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.79
Kimberly Foster
1W–7L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Cheryl Hahn
16W–16L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Laura Levine
22W–37L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Jan Bilthouse
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Connie Watson
12W–30L career · no lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
2.52
Karen Hites
4W–9L career · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.39
Marion Brown
17W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.