Teams

Cain

2026 CVTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '25 · Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-05vs CargleLost 23
W#1 DoublesMichele Nichols / Jamie Chen vs Olivia Williams / Shelly Bell6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAshley Olvera vs Cassidy Dysart1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Hicks / Lauren MacKie vs Ashley Venkatesu / Caroline Fincher6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLayne Scoggins vs Haley Henderson0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTeresa Cain / Lucy Leaming vs Beverley Floyd / Brittany Mize6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2025-10-23vs CVTA/Kimsey KendrickLost 13
L#1 DoublesShirley Rutledge / Jamie Chen vs Jennifer Martin / Caroline Barr4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLayne Scoggins vs Rebekah Waller2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa Cain / Michelle Gambill vs Kimsey Kendrick / Neeve Owen1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Blasius / Cindy Logan vs Bettina Briggs / Liz Mathis7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-14vs CVTA/Kimsey KendrickLost 04
L#1 DoublesJamie Chen / Lucy Leaming vs Kimsey Kendrick / Suni Carroll7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLauren MacKie / Michele Nichols vs Neeve Owen / Liz Mathis5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLayne Scoggins vs Rebekah Waller2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRegina Hicks / Cindy Logan vs Jennifer Martin / Caroline Barr2-6, 2-6
2025-10-08vs CargleLost 13
L#1 DoublesMichele Nichols / Michelle Gambill vs Sarah Cargle / Calli Davis2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesTeresa Cain vs Olivia Williams4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Logan / Jamie Chen vs Haley Henderson / Caroline Parker6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShirley Rutledge / Lauren MacKie vs Shelly Bell / Jill Robinson7-5, 6-0
2025-09-23vs CVTA/Kimsey KendrickLost 05
L#1 DoublesSarah Blasius / Jamie Chen vs Neeve Owen / Jennifer Martin6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTeresa Cain vs Katie Stout5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Nichols / Regina Hicks vs Margie Patton / Laura Ketcham3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAshley Olvera vs Jessica Laliberte2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLucy Leaming / Lauren MacKie vs Bettina Briggs / Liz Mathis2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-09-09vs CargleLost 23
W#1 DoublesShirley Rutledge / Jamie Chen vs Shelly Bell / Caroline Parker6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTeresa Cain vs Cassidy Dysart3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Nichols / Michelle Gambill vs Sarah Cargle / Calli Davis3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLayne Scoggins vs Haley Henderson0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRegina Hicks / Lucy Leaming vs Ashley Venkatesu / Caroline Fincher6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Lucy Leaming
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Jamie Chen
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.50
Cindy Logan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Shirley Rutledge
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Teresa Cain
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.44
Sarah Blasius
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Ashley Olvera
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.34
Michele Nichols
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
Layne Scoggins
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.16
Regina Hicks
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.12
Lauren MacKie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Michelle Gambill
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Chen + Shirley Rutledge224 matchesnot enough data
Michele Nichols + Regina Hicks134 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Logan + Regina Hicks033 matchesnot enough data
Michele Nichols + Layne Scoggins123 matchesnot enough data
Michele Nichols + Michelle Gambill033 matchesnot enough data
Layne Scoggins + Ashley Olvera123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucy Leaming
7W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.56
Jamie Chen
13W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Cindy Logan
7W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Shirley Rutledge
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.46
Teresa Cain
6W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.46
Sarah Blasius
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Ashley Olvera
29W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Michele Nichols
12W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.34
Layne Scoggins
8W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
3.32
Regina Hicks
25W–21L career · 10 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Lauren MacKie
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.12
Michelle Gambill
2W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.