Teams

PTC RED

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-23vs HG BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoy Coulter-Brown / Penny Malloy vs Theresa Hendrix / Maria Blakney7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / Helen Nelson vs Jackie Nelsen / Jane Webster7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJyll Lilly / SHERI ZASOWSKI vs Melody Sattizahn / Candace Sotwick6-3, 6-3
2021-06-16vs PRC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesTracy Bourque / Cheryl Sanders vs Denise Debartolomeis / Debra St John6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / Helen Nelson vs Henriette Nash / Kathleen Beyes6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2021-06-09vs LEBTC GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTracy Bourque / Dianne Leoni vs Brooke Sterling / Kathleen Samuelli1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTracy Pursell / Jyll Lilly vs Julie Reed / Lisa McGavern6-7, 1-6
2021-06-02vs HRCA ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesTracy Pursell / Joy Coulter-Brown vs Dee Zimmerman / Colleen Krebsbach7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDianne Leoni / Carol Lugo vs Carol Parrish / Nicola Zalkind6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSHERI ZASOWSKI / Jyll Lilly vs Judy Mickelson / Hillary Whitten6-2, 7-6
2021-05-26vs PRKR REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoy Coulter-Brown / Tracy Pursell vs Lisa Franklin / Elizabeth Anderson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHelen Nelson / Jyll Lilly vs Holly Smith / Diana Guardian6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLou Ann Witter / Penny Malloy vs Robin Mortenson / Barbara TerBlanche7-5, 6-3
2021-05-19vs GAC SILVERWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheryl Sanders / Tracy Bourque vs Debra Benge / Debra Reiss6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarol Lugo / Dianne Leoni vs Cynthia Wessinger / Jennifer Elliott6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHelen Nelson / Tracey Gau vs Ann Baer / Laura Thomson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2021-05-12vs CACI REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesTracey Gau / Tracy Bourque vs Margaret Ewald / Diane Wells5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Lugo / Helen Nelson vs Melinda Conover / Bernadette Rottschafer4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPenny Malloy / Lou Ann Witter vs Donna Coates / Virginia Gamble6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2021-05-05vs HG BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesTracy Pursell / Cheryl Sanders vs Theresa Hendrix / Patti Akright1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTracey Gau / MaryBeth Doerr vs Maria Blakney / Melody Sattizahn6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Lugo / Lou Ann Witter vs Elizabeth Zenk / Jane Webster6-0, 6-3
2021-04-28vs PRC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoy Coulter-Brown / Cheryl Sanders vs Cynthia Glasier / Denise Debartolomeis6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / Tracey Gau vs Linda Manassee Buell / Lisa Rosen2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLou Ann Witter / Penny Malloy vs Laura Jones / Anita Muhlbauer6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Tracy Bourque
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Dianne Leoni
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Joy Coulter-Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Carol Lugo
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Cheryl Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Tracy Pursell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.67
MaryBeth Doerr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Helen Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Jyll Lilly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lou Ann Witter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tracey Gau
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Coulter-Brown + Tracy Pursell28956% games+3.5% vs expected
Carol Lugo + Cheryl Sanders14557% games−0.9% vs expected
Tracy Bourque + Cheryl Sanders314 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Pursell + Carol Lugo303 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Pursell + Cheryl Sanders303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tracy Bourque
85W–126L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Dianne Leoni
53W–32L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Joy Coulter-Brown
102W–86L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Carol Lugo
128W–91L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Cheryl Sanders
133W–123L career · 4 lines in 2021
19%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Tracy Pursell
92W–79L career · 4 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
MaryBeth Doerr
48W–96L career · 4 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
Helen Nelson
4W–20L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jyll Lilly
4W–13L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lou Ann Witter
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tracey Gau
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.