Teams

ACAC Acers

2025 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesSamarth Singh / Christopher Raupp vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-10vs AHS PATA Cats-WelchSplit 22
L#1 DoublesZane Broden / Gabriel Ofiesh vs Rick Aasen / Bram Braakman6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPat BRadley vs Samuel Tanner6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPablo Barrague / Gregory Parrish vs Adam Healey / Long Duong6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesWesley Carson vs Eric Bryerton6-1, 6-1
2025-05-03vs BHSC-BurnsLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Raupp / Zane Broden vs David Burns / Robert Serpico6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-19vs AHS PATA Cats-WelchLost 01
L#2 SinglesChristopher Raupp vs Eric Bryerton5-7, 2-6
2025-04-12vs BHSC-BurnsWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Raupp / Robin Kariel vs Matthew Hedstrom / David Burns6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-29vs AHS PATA Cats-WelchLost 01
L#3 DoublesZane Broden / Christopher Raupp vs Bram Braakman / John Morgan4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Wesley Carson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.46
Pat BRadley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.36
Zane Broden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Gregory Parrish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Pablo Barrague
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Lloyd Raupp
published
3.01
Christopher Raupp
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Richard Sawyer
published
Gabriel Ofiesh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rakitha Chelliah
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wesley Carson
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Pat BRadley
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.46
Zane Broden
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Gregory Parrish
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
Pablo Barrague
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Lloyd Raupp
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Christopher Raupp
32W–84L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Richard Sawyer
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Gabriel Ofiesh
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rakitha Chelliah
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.