Teams

Tropical All-Courters

2025 Tri-One Doubles League · 4.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-06vs Tennis & Co.Won 10
W#1 DoublesTonya Dale / Laura Pattie vs Mieko Takada / Yuriko Christopher6-1, 6-3
2025-08-23vs Rosemary! POPLost 01
L#1 DoublesTonya Dale / Yukashi Smith vs Jessica Nishikawa / Kathleen Callahan3-6, 2-6
2025-08-16vs Tennis & Co.Lost 01
L#1 DoublesErica Chong / Dionne Kahale-Sirp vs Yukie O Brewer / Kaori Teixeira0-6, 0-6
2025-08-02vs Rosemary! POPLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Ramantin / Erica Chong vs Kaneko Bell / Linda Landau3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-26vs Tennis & Co.Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTonya Dale / Dionne Kahale-Sirp vs Saori Morio / Mieko Takada3-6, 2-6
2025-07-13vs Rosemary! POPLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Ramantin / Yukashi Smith vs Brooke Heiken / Jessica Nishikawa6-1, 0-6, 0-1
2025-07-06vs Tennis & Co.Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Pattie / Dionne Kahale-Sirp vs Saori Morio / Yukie O Brewer2-6, 3-6
2025-06-29vs Rosemary! POPLost 01
L#1 DoublesErica Chong / Laura Pattie vs Jennifer Alexander / Linda Landau2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Rosemary! POP7171450
2Tropical All-Courters17171482

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Yukashi Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Laura Pattie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Erica Chong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Dionne Kahale-Sirp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Tonya Dale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Ellen Ramantin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erica Chong + Dionne Kahale-Sirp4356% games+9.4% vs expected
Erica Chong + Tonya Dale3346% games−0.7% vs expected
Dionne Kahale-Sirp + Tonya Dale1431% games−0.9% vs expected
Yukashi Smith + Tonya Dale2335% games−1.6% vs expected
Yukashi Smith + Dionne Kahale-Sirp111250% games−2.4% vs expected
Ellen Ramantin + Tonya Dale2642% games−3.1% vs expected
Laura Pattie + Tonya Dale123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Yukashi Smith
102W–94L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Laura Pattie
23W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Erica Chong
53W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Dionne Kahale-Sirp
132W–128L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Tonya Dale
58W–109L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Ellen Ramantin
25W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.