Teams

Gould/DVAC/Foothils

2023 Foothills Mixed Doubles - 40 & over · 8.0 Mixed Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-23vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesShaun Sikes / Amanda Berry vs Aaron Swisher / Allison Holtzman6-2, 6-2
2023-07-16vs Tonks/YMCA/FoothillsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Berry / Jesse Miller vs Lynne Place / Kip Place6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKimberly Church / Shaun Sikes vs Dawn Owens / Vu Nguyen6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Pillow / Matt Long vs Robert Womack / Karen Tonks6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-16vs Tonks/YMCA/FoothillsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJason Triplett / Amanda Berry vs Jeanne Ann Lewis / Bo Lewis6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKimberly Church / Shaun Sikes vs Robert Womack / Karen Tonks6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Pillow / Matt Long vs Ellen Stupka / Ramsey Dellinger6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-27vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Templeton / Amanda Berry vs Aaron Steen / Alisa Crooks6-2, 6-2
2023-06-04vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJason Triplett / Amanda Berry vs Aaron Swisher / Allison Holtzman5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesShaun Sikes / Allison Meade vs Jim Heisler / Jenette Swisher7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Blythe Parker
published 4
4.07
Amanda Berry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Matt Long
published
3.82
Mark Templeton
published
3.80
Jennifer Pillow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Shaun Sikes
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Matt Fearrington
published
3.65
Kendra Gould
published 4
3.45
Kimberly Church
published
Jason Triplett
published
Katherine Beekman
published
Valerie Craig
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Blythe Parker
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
4.12
4.5
Amanda Berry
156W–74L career · 5 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
4.07
Matt Long
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Mark Templeton
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Jennifer Pillow
79W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Shaun Sikes
65W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Matt Fearrington
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Kendra Gould
51W–37L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Kimberly Church
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.45
Jason Triplett
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katherine Beekman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Valerie Craig
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.