Teams

Fermstad: Top 40

2025 ADULT 40 & OVER EARLY START · 4.0 MEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-19vs Craig/Lassow: Double Bagel E25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJustin Miller / Tony Mosser vs Victor Tonelli / Joel Sutton3-6, 2-6
2024-11-14vs Goodman SwillersLost 01
L#2 DoublesJim Terhaar / Justin Miller vs David Cross / Charles Carroll5-7, 4-6
2024-10-31vs Tuplano/Ostlund TBC 40+ 4.0 ES25Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJustin Miller vs Daniel Crouser6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJustin Miller vs Dave Malek2-6, 3-6
2024-10-10Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJustin Miller vs Edgar Oliveira2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Tony Mosser
published
3.62
Jim Dickinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Luis Laguna
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.60
Jim Terhaar
published
3.55
Dan Schauer
published 4
3.55
Justin Miller
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.55
Lucas Tesh
published
3.42
Tom Henjum
published
3.39
Derek Fermstad
published 3.5
3.30
Jason Ross
published
James Riley
published
Sean Koo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Ross + Jim Dickinson7549% games+5.2% vs expected
Lucas Tesh + Jim Terhaar2441% games−18.9% vs expected
Luis Laguna + Jim Dickinson2346% gamesnot enough data
Lucas Tesh + Tony Mosser044 matchesnot enough data
Luis Laguna + Derek Fermstad314 matchesnot enough data
Jim Terhaar + Tom Henjum213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tony Mosser
10W–30L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Jim Dickinson
18W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
Luis Laguna
13W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Jim Terhaar
9W–25L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Dan Schauer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Justin Miller
34W–43L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
Lucas Tesh
6W–26L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
Tom Henjum
3W–19L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Derek Fermstad
37W–32L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Jason Ross
16W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
James Riley
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sean Koo
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.