Teams

Adams/Chattanooga

2025 Adult 18 & Over-Chattanooga · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-11vs Barkeloo/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesLan Le / Nelu Farren vs Sarah Delay / Claire Mcvay3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Carter / April Chambers vs Tara Biondolillo / Lynne Barkeloo2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Adams / Alyssa Zellner vs Sarah Haney / Suzan House4-6, 4-6
2025-04-28vs Barkeloo/ChattanoogaLost 13
L#1 DoublesAshley Soni / Leslie Simmons vs Sarah Delay / Amy Weathers6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLan Le vs Meghan Wells6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Adams / April Chambers vs Serena Lau / Claire Mcvay3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJesse Robinson / Alyssa Zellner vs Lynne Barkeloo / Charmaine Kincaid3-6, 4-6
2025-04-21vs Barkeloo/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesRachel Adams / Jesse Robinson vs Suzan House / Claire Mcvay2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNelu Farren / Leslie Simmons vs Charmaine Kincaid / Amy Weathers4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Soni / Lan Le vs Cathy Palisoc / Sarah Delay3-6, 4-6
2025-04-19vs Barkeloo/ChattanoogaLost 02
L#1 DoublesHannah Davis / April Chambers vs Cathy Palisoc / Sarah Delay4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Adams / Jesse Robinson vs Charmaine Kincaid / Claire Mcvay4-6, 3-6
2025-04-12vs Barkeloo/ChattanoogaLost 12
L#1 DoublesApril Chambers / Ashley Soni vs Tara Biondolillo / Claire Mcvay1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLan Le vs Meghan Wells6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNelu Farren / Jessica Carter vs Sarah Haney / Serena Lau0-6, 0-6
2025-04-05vs Barkeloo/ChattanoogaLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlyssa Zellner / Jessica Carter vs Cathy Palisoc / Claire Mcvay0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNelu Farren / Jesse Robinson vs Lynne Barkeloo / Serena Lau3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Barkeloo/Chattanooga6020410155
2Adams/Chattanooga0632142267

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Brittany Portwood
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Lori Boyd
published
3.34
Ashley Soni
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Alyssa Zellner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Nelu Farren
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
April Chambers
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Jesse Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Lan Le
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brittany Portwood
45W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
Lori Boyd
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Ashley Soni
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Alyssa Zellner
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nelu Farren
19W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.21
3
April Chambers
22W–40L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Jesse Robinson
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lan Le
26W–8L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.