Teams

TOC.Nowell

2025 CTRL Tri-Level 55 & Over · Tri-Level 55 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-19vs TOC.SmithLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephen Mungenast / Mike Swanson vs Paul Lebiecz / Ronald Radloff4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJames Klemenz / Michael Didner vs David Bruner / Jeffrey Madia4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-12vs TOC.SmithSplit 11
L#1 DoublesShirish Javalkar / Daniel Ford vs David Ferris / John Latzy6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJames Klemenz / Ken Nowell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-28vs TOC.SmithWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Didner / James Klemenz vs Dirk German / Jeffrey Madia6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKen Glanville / Scott Zargo vs John Latzy / David Ferris3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephen Mungenast / Kurt Holmberg vs Paul Lebiecz / Onur Uman4-6, 5-2
2025-06-28vs TOC.SmithLost 02
L#1 DoublesKen Nowell / Scott Riley vs David Anderson / Dirk German2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesStephen Mungenast / Mario Karcevski vs Mark McCormick / Alfredo Aldereguia2-6, 3-6
2025-06-21vs TOC.SmithWon 20
W#2 DoublesMike Gaul / Shirish Javalkar vs Kevin Fitzcharles / David Ferris7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMike Swanson / Stephen Mungenast vs Mark McCormick / Ronald Radloff6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-18vs TOC.SmithWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Didner / James Klemenz vs David Bruner / Jeffrey Madia7-6, 6-3
2025-06-14vs TOC.SmithLost 02
L#2 DoublesMike Gaul / Scott Zargo vs John Latzy / David Ferris3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMario Karcevski / Stephen Mungenast vs Onur Uman / Alfredo Aldereguia4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 55 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
James Klemenz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Mark Baldwin
published
3.76
Ken Nowell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Scott Riley
published
3.65
Mike Gaul
published
3.43
Daniel Ford
published
3.42
Ken Glanville
published
3.27
Scott Zargo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Joseph Holsopple
published
3.06
Shirish Javalkar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Mike Swanson
published
2.75
Stephen Mungenast
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Jeff Newton
published
Mario Karcevski
published
Michael Didner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Baldwin + Ken Nowell4159% gamesnot enough data
James Klemenz + Ken Nowell224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Klemenz
188W–132L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Mark Baldwin
18W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Ken Nowell
211W–146L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Scott Riley
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Mike Gaul
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.65
Daniel Ford
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Ken Glanville
18W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Scott Zargo
60W–71L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Joseph Holsopple
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Shirish Javalkar
42W–172L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Mike Swanson
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Stephen Mungenast
93W–132L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Jeff Newton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mario Karcevski
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Didner
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.