Teams

Tightly Strung

OBX Adult 55 & OVER · 3.0 WOMEN evening

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-28vs spring 2026 PRLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn McDowell / Kellie Gearhart vs Rhonda McKeever / Betsy Williams2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Yaksich / Suzanne Rich vs Lori McGraw / Kristen Iwashchenko1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSallie Kerr / Catherine McGrogan vs Bonnie Midkiff / Chris Kent0-6, 5-7
2026-04-21vs spring 2026 PRSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAvery Harrison / Ann McDowell vs Rhonda McKeever / Betsy Williams6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKellie Gearhart / Melanie Yaksich vs Kristen Iwashchenko / Lori McGraw4-6, 6-7
2026-04-14vs spring 2026 PRLost 03
L#1 DoublesMonica Thibodeau / Suzanne Rich vs Beth Foreman / Rhonda McKeever0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnn McDowell / Melanie Yaksich vs Barbara Lifsey / Bonnie Midkiff3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGinger Webster / Sallie Kerr vs JoAnne Willis / Chris Kent0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-07vs spring 2026 PRLost 12
L#1 DoublesJessie McClary / Anna Hite vs Rhonda McKeever / Lori McGraw0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Rich / Janet Colegrove vs Barbara Lifsey / Kristen Iwashchenko6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSallie Kerr / Ann McDowell vs Bonnie Midkiff / Betsy Williams3-6, 4-6
2026-03-31vs spring 2026 PRLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Zasada / Monica Thibodeau vs Rhonda McKeever / Beth Foreman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGinger Webster / Kellie Gearhart vs Anne Kelleher / Barbara Lifsey1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Rich / Melanie Yaksich vs Betsy Williams / Bonnie Midkiff1-6, 2-6
2026-03-24vs spring 2026 PRLost 12
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Rich / Janet Colegrove vs Rhonda McKeever / Lori McGraw2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Hite / Jessie McClary vs Bonnie Midkiff / Kristen Iwashchenko6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAvery Harrison / Ann McDowell vs JoAnne Willis / Betsy Williams6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-03-17vs spring 2026 PRLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Hite / Avery Harrison vs Lori McGraw / Beth Foreman3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJessie McClary / Jennifer Zasada vs Anne Kelleher / Kristen Iwashchenko3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMelanie Yaksich / Sallie Kerr vs Betsy Williams / JoAnne Willis4-6, 1-6
2026-03-10vs spring 2026 PRWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnna Hite / Jennifer Zasada vs Kristen Iwashchenko / Betsy Williams6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMonica Thibodeau / Avery Harrison vs Lori McGraw / JoAnne Willis6-4, 6-2
2026-03-03vs spring 2026 PRSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanet Colegrove / Jessie McClary vs Beth Foreman / Kristen Iwashchenko6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKellie Gearhart / Catherine McGrogan vs Lori McGraw / JoAnne Willis0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 WOMEN evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1spring 2026 PR6318922212
2Tightly Strung3691837250

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Ginger Webster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Anna Hite
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.91
Jennifer Zasada
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Janet Colegrove
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.76
Jessie McClary
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Catherine McGrogan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Avery Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.64
Monica Thibodeau
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Ann McDowell
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.49
Kellie Gearhart
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.42
Melanie Yaksich
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.33
Sallie Kerr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Colegrove + Jessie McClary2349% gamesnot enough data
Avery Harrison + Anna Hite224 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Yaksich + Sallie Kerr134 matchesnot enough data
Monica Thibodeau + Avery Harrison213 matchesnot enough data
Jessie McClary + Anna Hite213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ginger Webster
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Anna Hite
18W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.97
Jennifer Zasada
5W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Janet Colegrove
17W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Jessie McClary
14W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Catherine McGrogan
1W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Avery Harrison
11W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Monica Thibodeau
10W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Ann McDowell
2W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Kellie Gearhart
11W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
Melanie Yaksich
2W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
Sallie Kerr
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.