Teams

LEECHAR/Attuso

2026 LeeCharlotte Adult 18 & Over Spring · 3.5 W

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-04vs Courts at Cape Coral - RiccioLost 01
L#2 DoublesJane Zito / Paula Pirruccello vs Val Pacenta / Sue Savage2-6, 6-7
2026-05-14vs UTC - GonzalezWon 10
W#3 DoublesMaria Alvelo / Raquel Teixeira vs Regina Lookis / Melissa Bunce6-1, 7-5
2026-04-30vs FMRC - BoydWon 10
W#3 DoublesSherri Campbell / Maria Alvelo vs Karen Kotz / Tammy Mueller5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-29vs Gateway - BlackmonWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnn Boyd / Sherri Campbell vs Molly Hawkins / Peggy Inniss6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Kim Shotwell
published
3.59
Nancy Aloia
published
3.59
Hilary Cole
published
3.56
Emma May
published
3.52
Raquel Teixeira
published
3.51
Melissa Dorr
published
3.49
3.35
Sherri Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Pamella Attuso
published
3.33
J Q Hall
published
3.32
Jane Zito
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Ann Boyd
published 3.5
3.27
Wendy Olek
published
3.14
Maria Alvelo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Janet Choisnet
published
3.00
Mary Lowe
published
Paula Pirruccello
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Dorr + Christina Candelario8168% games+11.2% vs expected
Jane Zito + Sherri Campbell2348% gamesnot enough data
Raquel Teixeira + Emma May5064% gamesnot enough data
Sherri Campbell + Ann Boyd303 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Olek + Christina Candelario303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Shotwell
20W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.64
Nancy Aloia
15W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
Hilary Cole
18W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.59
Emma May
32W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
Raquel Teixeira
27W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
Melissa Dorr
23W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Christina Candelario
87W–35L career · no lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Sherri Campbell
198W–138L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Pamella Attuso
11W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
J Q Hall
8W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Jane Zito
186W–105L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Ann Boyd
13W–6L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Wendy Olek
17W–11L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Maria Alvelo
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.14
Janet Choisnet
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Mary Lowe
21W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Paula Pirruccello
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.