Teams

Five Seasons Cincinnati

2025 OH OV SPRING Career A40&O Cincinnati · 2025 Spring Career A 40&O 4.5W Cincinnati

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-12vs HarpersLost 13
L#1 DoublesGillian Oakenfull / Moreen Nienaber vs Lauren Aebischer / Lindsay Crowley3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPamela Wise vs Sara Vincent1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelissa Derry / Laurel Fritzhand vs Miho Morris / Maureen Ernst4-6, 5-6
W#3 DoublesBeth Kushon / Amy Benge vs Kristi Hayes / Jennifer Taft6-2, 6-3
2025-04-24vs HarpersLost 13
L#1 DoublesAmy Benge / Beth Kushon vs Kay Harmeyer / Melanie Vollmer6-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Derry vs Maggie Wuellner6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Cunningham / Yasemin Kaya Congleton vs Tatiana Hwa / Lindsay Crowley4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGillian Oakenfull / Elizabeth Newell vs Meta Stoll / Jennifer Taft3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-28vs HarpersWon 32
L#1 DoublesKatie Penland / Kylee Thiel vs Amy Cooper / Kay Harmeyer0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesGillian Oakenfull vs Meredith Sweeney6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Kushon / Amy Benge vs Meta Stoll / Maggie Wuellner6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMariko Shimada / Yasemin Kaya Congleton vs Miho Morris / Sara Vincent6-4, 6-2
L#4 DoublesElizabeth Newell / Laurel Fritzhand vs Tatiana Hwa / Lindsay Crowley4-6, 4-6
2025-03-19vs HarpersLost 23
L#1 DoublesGillian Oakenfull / Melissa Pregel vs Susan Butler / Kristi Hayes0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Benge vs Sara Vincent6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKylee Thiel / Melissa Derry vs Meta Stoll / Melanie Vollmer3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPamela Wise / Naomi Boland vs Lindsay Crowley / Tatiana Hwa2-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesMoreen Nienaber / Katie Penland vs Amy Cooper / Kay Harmeyer4-6, 1-6
2025-03-11vs HarpersLost 14
L#1 DoublesGillian Oakenfull / Yasemin Kaya Congleton vs Tatiana Hwa / Lindsay Crowley5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Derry vs Meredith Sweeney6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKylee Thiel / Moreen Nienaber vs Diane Rumpke / Melanie Vollmer5-7, 6-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa Pregel / Pamela Wise vs Susan Butler / Kristi Hayes3-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesAmy Benge / Beth Kushon vs Meta Stoll / Amy Cooper5-7, 4-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 2025 Spring Career A 40&O 4.5W Cincinnati
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Five Seasons Cincinnati1481735247

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Elizabeth Newell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.38
Amy Benge
usually #1 Doubles 20%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.37
Mariko Shimada
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.36
Yasemin Kaya Congleton
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.35
Kylee Thiel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.24
Gillian Oakenfull
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.16
Moreen Nienaber
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
Beth Kushon
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Jenna Goodman
published
Katie Penland
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Laurel Fritzhand
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Melissa Derry
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Melissa Pregel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Naomi Boland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Wise
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Kushon + Elizabeth Newell404 matchesnot enough data
Beth Kushon + Gillian Oakenfull213 matchesnot enough data
Yasemin Kaya Congleton + Mariko Shimada303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elizabeth Newell
73W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Amy Benge
17W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.38
Mariko Shimada
13W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
4.37
Yasemin Kaya Congleton
21W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
4.36
Kylee Thiel
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Gillian Oakenfull
21W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Moreen Nienaber
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
4.16
4.5
Beth Kushon
79W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.87
Jenna Goodman
27W–31L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Penland
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurel Fritzhand
26W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Derry
6W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Pregel
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Naomi Boland
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Wise
21W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.