Teams

IHCC Pruett Mixed 6.0

2025 Tuscaloosa USTA Mixed 18 & Over - Spring · 3.0 Adult Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-01vs TTC Kirkland 3.0 Mixed Spring 2025Split 11
L#1 DoublesBailey Chambers / Bradley Falkner vs Stephanie Kirkland / Scott Smith1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMatt Pavlick / Frances Pruett vs Lisa Bristow / Bill Sullivan6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesMatt Pavlick / Janie Ellis vs Lakin Smith / Scott Smith6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTom Meriwether / Caroline Williams vs Thomas English / Heather English6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSamuel Brewer / Frances Pruett vs Bill Sullivan / Lisa Bristow1-6, 2-6
2025-04-27vs TTC Kirkland 3.0 Mixed Spring 2025Lost 02
L#2 DoublesCaroline Williams / Samuel Brewer vs Junsoo Lee / Ciana Ortiguera4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBradley Falkner / Frances Pruett vs Heather English / Bill Sullivan3-6, 2-6
2025-04-13vs TTC Kirkland 3.0 Mixed Spring 2025Split 11
W#1 DoublesBrad Lee / Janie Ellis vs Junsoo Lee / Lakin Smith6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCaroline Williams / Tom Meriwether vs Thomas English / Heather English0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanie Ellis / Timarques Samuel vs Ciana Ortiguera / Bill Sullivan7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFrances Pruett / Tom Meriwether vs Thomas English / Lakin Smith7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJanie Ellis / Matt Pavlick vs Chad Jaggers / Ciana Ortiguera6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTom Meriwether / Frances Pruett vs Scott Smith / Lakin Smith6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTimarques Samuel / Caroline Williams vs Junsoo Lee / Heather English6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Timarques Samuel
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Caroline Williams
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Janie Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.56
Bradley Falkner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.27
Frances Pruett
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Bailey Chambers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Matt Pavlick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Samuel Brewer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tom Meriwether
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Timarques Samuel
25W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.79
3
Caroline Williams
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Janie Ellis
38W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%8%92%
2.70
3
Bradley Falkner
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
Frances Pruett
14W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Bailey Chambers
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Matt Pavlick
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samuel Brewer
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Meriwether
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.