Teams

Gaines/Wood 18s 3.0W Singles Sunday

2026 Piedmont Singles 18+ · 3.0 Women Singles

7 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Rebecca Sheppard1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Shannon Smith3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesCaroline Jackson vs Shelly Tuhro2-6, 0-6
2026-07-26vs Payne 18s 3.0W Singles SundayLost 01
L#1 SinglesAllison Chisholm vs Suki Gutierrez2-6, 1-6
2026-07-19vs Olalere 18s 3.0W Singles SundayLost 12
W#1 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Annie Vorys5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAllison Chisholm vs Kimberley Cathey6-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesStephanie Oudinot vs Kathryn Roberts5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCelestial Corridon vs Rachel Bryant2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesStephanie Oudinot vs Josslyn Hizer1-6, 3-6
2026-07-12vs East 18s 3.0W Singles SundayLost 12
L#1 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Alexa Smith2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Ashton Choros0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJulia Saguier vs Barbara Michael6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesStephanie Oudinot vs Clara Gonzalez Flores0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAllison Chisholm vs Sydney Wittman1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJulia Saguier vs Shannon Smith3-6, 1-6
2026-06-21vs Payne 18s 3.0W Singles SundayLost 02
L#1 SinglesCelestial Corridon vs Rosemarie Palazzolo2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Meredith Vaughn0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-14vs Olalere 18s 3.0W Singles SundayWon 21
L#1 SinglesAllison Chisholm vs Annie Vorys3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Sara Core6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesCaroline Jackson vs Angela Olalere6-2, 6-4
2026-06-07vs East 18s 3.0W Singles SundayWon 21
W#1 SinglesStephanie Oudinot vs Ashton Choros6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Nancy Stoddard1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesJulia Saguier vs Barbara Michael6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCelestial Corridon vs Meredith Foley3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesCaroline Jackson vs Rachel Bryant1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Celestial Corridon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.81
Cozetta Gaines
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.56
Allison Chisholm
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Singles 44% · published 2.5
2.50
Julia Saguier
usually #3 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.48
Stephanie Oudinot
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.38
Allyson Wood
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.11
Caroline Jackson
usually #3 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Celestial Corridon
19W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Cozetta Gaines
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
2.5
Allison Chisholm
27W–24L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.56
Julia Saguier
32W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
Stephanie Oudinot
5W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Allyson Wood
15W–24L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
2.5
Caroline Jackson
8W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.