Teams

SKY GOLD

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-08vs WP REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesJohn Toaspern / Joshua Solot vs Chris Cramer / Wade Westphal3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-24vs GPTC REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesElmo Morales / Joshua Solot vs Peter Sarnataro / Viktor Bojilov1-6, 6-7
2025-06-17vs WP-G GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrian Dwyer / Thomas Abell vs Seamus Doyle / Cam Weprin6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJeff Hutcheson vs Pil Kim2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Kippley / Chris Smith vs Hicham Zhiri / Mihir Mehta6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElmo Morales / Joshua Solot vs Konstantin Gradushy / Mario Crobu2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-03vs CACM REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesKevin Humphrey / Joshua Solot vs David Rich / Charles Greenhouse1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Brian Dwyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Tom Parnell
published
3.31
Jeff Hutcheson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.27
Chris Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Thomas Abell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Chris Boynton
published 3.5
3.08
Joshua Solot
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
John Toaspern
published
2.78
Kevin Humphrey
published
2.78
Elmo Morales
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Kippley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Dwyer + Chris Boynton4164% games+10.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brian Dwyer
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Tom Parnell
30W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Jeff Hutcheson
21W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Chris Smith
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Thomas Abell
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Chris Boynton
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Joshua Solot
17W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
John Toaspern
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.97
Kevin Humphrey
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.78
Elmo Morales
6W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
John Kippley
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.