Teams

MLM:Lincer/Lusardi

2025 NCT Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 40 & Over Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-06vs EHTC:Vamos!:Bray/DeJuanLost 03
L#1 DoublesOpal Bravo / Tejas Bhatt vs Shane Hassett / Priya Fitzgerald3-6
L#2 DoublesJudith Mason / Carl Castanho vs Min Xu / Lindsay Butler2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEmily Bradley / Steve Lusardi vs Carrie Silver-Bernstein / Thomas Donovan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-11-17vs RFL:Return To Sender:Leshem/Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSteven Hadge / Kristen Gourley vs Jannine Leshem / Jonathan Orenstein2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesOpal Bravo / Tejas Bhatt vs Julie McNeill / Anthony Wion4-6, 2-6
2024-11-10vs BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:Datsko/Won 20
W#1 DoublesTejas Bhatt / Opal Bravo vs Jennifer Moffa / Rohan Brown6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteven Hadge / Kristen Gourley vs Julie Piller / Andrew Robinson6-1, 6-4
2024-11-03vs BTC:In Bloom 40+:Song/Lost 02
L#1 DoublesOpal Bravo / Tejas Bhatt vs Courtney Marum / Rick Wu2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Gourley / Steven Hadge vs Xianyuan Song / Raul Valdes4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-20vs BTC:In Bloom 40+:Song/Lost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Mason / Judith Mason vs Courtney Marum / Hu Zhang0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesOpal Bravo / Marcin Stasiak vs Christine Abreu / Dmitri Pidvysotski4-6, 0-6
2024-10-13vs RFL:Return To Sender:Leshem/Lost 03
L#1 DoublesOpal Bravo / Tejas Bhatt vs Susan Emhoff / Mark Briggs6-2, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJudith Mason / Scott Mason vs Erica Bridge / Anthony Wion0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Bradley / Steve Lusardi vs Jannine Leshem / Dilip Rangnekar4-6, 2-6
2024-09-22vs EHTC:Vamos!:Bray/DeJuanLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Mason / Denise Toce vs Karen Eller / Min Xu4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Bradley / Carl Castanho vs Nancy Bray / Adrian Cosma7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-09-15vs BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:Datsko/Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTejas Bhatt / Opal Bravo vs Jason Lang / KORI BURKHOLDER2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesScott Mason / Judith Mason vs Rohan Brown / Sophia Beason-Brown5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 8.0 40 & Over Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFL:Return To Sender:Leshem/0818514143
2BTC:In Bloom 40+:Song/0816721178
3BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:Datsko/0891431216
4EHTC:Vamos!:Bray/DeJuan08121232235
5MLM:Lincer/Lusardi0822144270
6RH:Topspin Terminators:Dunn/01023720248
7ETC:Mass Invasion:Schaffer/Ferriter010181128250
8RH:Rockets:Baron/Baron010161434257
9FV:Wise Aces:Na/Glasgow010131738288
10BSF:Deuces Wild:Polhamus/Turekian010101940293
11FV:De Baeck/01082047326

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Kristen Gourley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Tejas Bhatt
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.64
Opal Bravo
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.55
Denise Toce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Judith Mason
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.54
Karina Lincer
published
Carl Castanho
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Emily Bradley
published
Marcin Stasiak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Mason
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Steve Lusardi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Gourley + Steve Lusardi11358% games+11.7% vs expected
Tejas Bhatt + Opal Bravo71446% games−0.9% vs expected
Steve Lusardi + Opal Bravo61047% games−3.4% vs expected
Denise Toce + Tejas Bhatt0644% games−9.5% vs expected
Scott Mason + Judith Mason231952% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Gourley + Tejas Bhatt3253% gamesnot enough data
Steve Lusardi + Denise Toce2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Gourley
55W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
Tejas Bhatt
40W–77L career · 6 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Opal Bravo
78W–161L career · 7 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Denise Toce
103W–96L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Judith Mason
72W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Karina Lincer
7W–30L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
Carl Castanho
2W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Emily Bradley
29W–67L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marcin Stasiak
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Scott Mason
29W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Lusardi
54W–68L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.