Teams

Khan

2024 Anne Arundel Singles · Anne Arundel Singles 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-09vs FretzLost 01
L#2 SinglesRussell Hester vs Ross Owens2-6, 1-6
2024-10-23vs FretzWon 21
W#1 SinglesPaul Moskios vs Ross Owens7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesYusuf Higazi vs Damion Trasada6-0, 7-5
L#3 SinglesOmar Ahmad vs Luke Mudd1-6, 6-7
2024-10-19vs ThomassonSplit 11
W#1 SinglesPaul Moskios vs Bryan Williams7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDaniel Weitman vs Nnamaka Nwakaihe2-6, 1-6
2024-10-09Won 10
W#2 SinglesRussell Hester vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-16vs ThomassonWon 21
W#1 SinglesOmar Khan vs Bryan Williams2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesOmar Ahmad vs Andrew Isch2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesTy Sanders vs Nnamaka Nwakaihe4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Ty Sanders
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.52
Omar Khan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.26
Russell Hester
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
Daniel Weitman
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Omar Ahmad
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Paul Moskios
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Yusuf Higazi
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ty Sanders
28W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.77
Omar Khan
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Russell Hester
46W–66L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Daniel Weitman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Omar Ahmad
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul Moskios
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Yusuf Higazi
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.