Teams

Schrenkel Combo 7.5 40 2025

2025 Decatur Southern Combo 40 and Over · 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-25vs DE 7.5W 40 and over (Peebles)Split 11
L#1 DoublesChristy Williams / Angie Harris vs Ann Copeland / Elizabeth Vickery4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarmen Schrenkel / Rebecca Bibb vs Carolyn Carter / Kay Noller6-2, 6-4
2025-09-22vs Wright Combo 7.5 40 2025Won 20
W#1 DoublesAnnie Diaz / Rebecca Bibb vs Beth Wilbanks / Jennifer Pugh6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDebra Roberson / Christy Williams vs Michele Smith / Tammy Wingfield6-1, 6-2
2025-09-20vs DE 7.5W 40 and over (Peebles)Split 11
L#1 DoublesRegina Raney / Christi Cappelletti vs Ann Copeland / Kam Acupan4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKristy Haraway / Nora Vanderploeg vs Wendy Hamilton / Kay Noller6-1, 6-2
2025-09-15vs Wright Combo 7.5 40 2025Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAnnie Diaz / Rebecca Bibb vs Kathy Smith / Courtney Perrin6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarmen Schrenkel / Debra Roberson vs Michelle Condurso / Maribeth Newman1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRegina Raney / Nora Vanderploeg vs Katherine Russell / Tammy Wingfield0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-09-13vs DE 7.5W 40 and over (Peebles)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLensey Smith / Angela Foster vs Ann Copeland / Lori Tillery3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnnie Diaz / Nora Vanderploeg vs Kristy Palmer / Kay Noller2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRegina Raney / Angie Harris vs Stacey Peebles / Wendy Brandon3-6, 5-7
2025-09-02vs Wright Combo 7.5 40 2025Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAngie Harris / Christy Williams vs Tammy Wingfield / Jennifer Pugh7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNora Vanderploeg / Carmen Schrenkel vs Susan Jensen / Maribeth Newman1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnnie Diaz / Debra Roberson vs Michelle Condurso / Michele Smith3-6, 3-6
2025-08-14vs Wright Combo 7.5 40 2025Won 21
W#1 DoublesChristi Cappelletti / Kristy Haraway vs Kathy Smith / Courtney Perrin7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Bibb / Regina Raney vs Beth Wilbanks / Jennifer Pugh6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNora Vanderploeg / Lensey Smith vs Michelle Condurso / Nermein Lotfy4-6, 3-6
2025-08-13vs DE 7.5W 40 and over (Peebles)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKristy Haraway / Debra Roberson vs Morgan Coulter / Elizabeth Vickery6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnnie Diaz / Christi Cappelletti vs Carolyn Carter / Traci Calvert6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristy Williams / Angela Foster vs Wendy Hamilton / Wendy Brandon7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Kristy Haraway
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Annie Diaz
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.61
Lensey Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Carmen Schrenkel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Regina Raney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Rebecca Bibb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Christi Cappelletti
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Debra Roberson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Angie Harris
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Angela Foster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Nora Vanderploeg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lensey Smith + Kristy Haraway6950% games−0.5% vs expected
Christi Cappelletti + Angela Foster2443% games−10.9% vs expected
Carmen Schrenkel + Annie Diaz2342% games−21.8% vs expected
Christi Cappelletti + Annie Diaz134 matchesnot enough data
Carmen Schrenkel + Regina Raney123 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Bibb + Annie Diaz213 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Bibb + Regina Raney123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristy Haraway
68W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Annie Diaz
16W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Lensey Smith
40W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Carmen Schrenkel
17W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Regina Raney
6W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Rebecca Bibb
14W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.39
3.5
Christi Cappelletti
50W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Debra Roberson
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Angie Harris
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Angela Foster
12W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Nora Vanderploeg
58W–53L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.