Teams

DBaker-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Eve

11 players · average NTRP 2.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-24vs LKane-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesKellianne White / Alexa Wallace vs Dianna White / Victoria Swoager1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesVickie Gibbs / Gretchen LoFrese vs Victoria Loskutova / Onyi Dillibe6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHannah Gahagan / Kerry Espinola vs Emilie Moses / Lauren Kane3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Kellianne White
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Gretchen LoFrese
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Kim Hutter
published 3
2.79
Janet Ranheim
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Alexa Hartenstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Megan Prieto
published
2.68
Hannah Gahagan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Kerry Espinola
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Nora Mishriky
published
2.36
Vickie Gibbs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.14
Rachel Latson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexa Hartenstein + Kim Hutter3258% games+9.2% vs expected
Kerry Espinola + Janet Ranheim3451% games+5.3% vs expected
Alexa Hartenstein + Kellianne White7944% games−2.2% vs expected
Gretchen LoFrese + Alexa Hartenstein4845% games−2.8% vs expected
Kerry Espinola + Alexa Hartenstein7648% games−5.3% vs expected
Gretchen LoFrese + Kellianne White4843% games−9.7% vs expected
Kerry Espinola + Kim Hutter1629% games−14.8% vs expected
Gretchen LoFrese + Kerry Espinola12362% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kellianne White
171W–127L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.14
3
Gretchen LoFrese
221W–139L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Kim Hutter
31W–28L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Janet Ranheim
108W–113L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Alexa Hartenstein
112W–89L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Megan Prieto
13W–18L career · no lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.78
Hannah Gahagan
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%10%90%
2.68
3
Kerry Espinola
129W–130L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Nora Mishriky
11W–9L career · no lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Vickie Gibbs
54W–74L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Rachel Latson
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.