Teams

OC Lifetime RSC - Bev

2022 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-12-09vs OC Lifetime RSC - KellyLost 01
L#3 DoublesJanice Trojan / Amy Schetman vs Kelly Stacy / Christine Parry2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Schetman / Marianne Richards vs Regina Jacobs / Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKathleen Waite / Janice Trojan vs Kelly Kehlet / Robia Scott2-6, 1-6
2022-11-19vs OC LNRC - GinaLost 01
L#2 DoublesNina Ames / Marianne Richards vs Pamela Herr / Courtney Zani5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-11-11vs OC Great Park - Nan Diesen-NgWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnnette Drake / Marianne Richards vs Paula Nishibayashi / Su Prijyanonda6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-11-04vs OC Coto De CazaWon 10
W#1 DoublesLynn Moore / Marianne Richards vs Tammy Hyland / Christy Julianel0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-28vs OC The Huntington Club - CherylWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarianne Richards / Michelle Smith vs Jackie MacNew / Emalyn Anthony6-2, 6-2
2022-10-21vs OC NBTC - GiannaLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Smith / Marianne Richards vs Miriam Morales / Kristen Bendanna2-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesMarianne Richards / Michelle Smith vs Mina Whitlock / Valentina Stepanova4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-09-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarianne Richards / Lynn Moore vs Kandis Arnold / Allison Herman6-1, 7-6
2022-09-16vs OC MVTC - DianaLost 02
L#2 DoublesMarianne Richards / Michelle Smith vs Bonnie Lee / Joleen Wells3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNina Ames / Janice Trojan vs Jackelinne Bartel / Terry Ward4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
3.87
Annette Drake
published 4
3.83
Marianne Richards
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Amy Schetman
published 4
3.70
Patty Podley
published
3.63
Janice Trojan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Sonia Bishop
published
3.51
Nina Ames
published
3.50
Bev Merwin
published 3.5
Kerri Husbands
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Reenders
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
4.08
4
Annette Drake
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Marianne Richards
98W–77L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Amy Schetman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patty Podley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Janice Trojan
27W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Sonia Bishop
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Nina Ames
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Bev Merwin
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.50
Kerri Husbands
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.