Teams

SDNC 4.0 Morgan Run/ Merino (3:2)

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - Women - 4.0WD

13 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#3 DoublesLori Merino / Catherine Baird vs Yvonne Kalench / Dana Moskowitz1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLori Merino / Katherine Thompson vs Lisa Farrar / Stephanie Yasukochi3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Graber / Kelly Lemker vs Susie Alvarez / Krista Evans-Moreno6-3, 6-4
2022-05-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesLori Merino / Katherine Thompson vs Teri Smelik / Jeebee Yim6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLori Merino / Katherine Thompson vs Lisa Shulman / Randy Buckley6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMinhTam Flynn / Kelly Lemker vs Salma Ott / Clare Lemon6-3, 7-5
2022-04-08Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Graber / Kelly Lemker vs Suzanne Lichter / Susan Conover Gehrke3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 4.0WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Catherine Baird
published 4
3.92
Rebecca Fritz
published
3.83
Lori Merino
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
MinhTam Flynn
published
3.68
Monica Berenter
published 4
3.67
Autumn Snow
published 4
3.65
Kristin Adams
published
3.62
Laurie Dunn
published
3.60
Jennifer Graber
published
3.50
Edna Mattei
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Singles 11% · published 4
3.35
Kelly Lemker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jennifer FIelds
published
Katherine Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Dunn + Kristin Adams134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Baird
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%1%99%
4.32
Rebecca Fritz
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.92
4
Lori Merino
43W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
MinhTam Flynn
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Monica Berenter
65W–77L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Autumn Snow
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Kristin Adams
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Laurie Dunn
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.62
Jennifer Graber
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Edna Mattei
45W–46L career · 9 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.50
3.5
Kelly Lemker
85W–67L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Jennifer FIelds
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Katherine Thompson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.