Teams

Freeman

2022 Winter Singles Flex League (YER) · 3.0 Men

1 player · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-06-25vs CoombesLost 01
L#1 SinglesKetil Freeman vs JON COOMBES4-6, 2-6
2022-06-11Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKetil Freeman vs GARREN WEINER5-7, 3-6
2022-05-28vs AtaRacing2Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKetil Freeman vs Tamer Ozkaraoglu0-6, 3-6
2022-05-21vs Boris Yeltsin's Left NutLost 01
L#1 SinglesKetil Freeman vs Atreya Laxman4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-05-10vs Hardie-RLost 01
L#1 SinglesKetil Freeman vs Ryan Hardie3-6, 1-6
2022-05-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesKetil Freeman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-27vs Brandon TutmarcWon 10
W#1 SinglesKetil Freeman vs Brandon Tutmarc6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2022-03-23vs FanaruLost 01
L#1 SinglesKetil Freeman vs Adrian Fanaru1-6, 1-6
2022-03-22vs MckenzieWon 10
W#1 SinglesKetil Freeman vs Bill McKenzie6-3, 6-3
2022-02-24Won 10
W#1 SinglesKetil Freeman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-20vs AalfsWon 10
W#1 SinglesKetil Freeman vs Matthew Aalfs4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-02-12Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKetil Freeman vs Andy Bergen1-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings44 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HFarber505006
2Voutsas5050121
3Coombes5151229
4PAE5151335
5Polito5151439
6Harriman4141223
7Rawlinson4141331
8I Saw Demised Sheep4141324
9Dhindsa4242341
10RChin4242343
11AtaRacing24242435
12Fanaru4242428
13Kim4242550
14Lerer4242542
15Zhang-3.54242550
16Funtime4242655
17dribbling3232335
18OWENS3232425
19Wolfer3333650
20S Singh3333645
21Linden3333644
22de Boutray3333654
23NoMaR(-_-)3333655
24Boris Yeltsin's Left Nut3333854
25Templeton 3.5 Men2323636
26zlin2323746
27Levering2323749
28Garren2424857
29EccentricER Nobleman2424846
30Shinn2424856
31Liu2424959
32R Bussard2424958
33Olson1414848
34Ferrucci1414850
35PNW10sPro1414844
36Ren1414848
37Freeman15151062
38BunkerR15151064
39Kirkegaard-3.515151169
40savas-3.505051060
41Serbanescu05051060
42Watson05051060
43Wanat06061272
44Zheng06061273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Ketil Freeman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ketil Freeman
47W–102L career · 12 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.