Teams

UMLY

Adult 40 & Over Summer · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.83 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-29vs Serve it UpWon 31
W#1 DoublesSo Young Jang / Amy Benchener vs Jessica Smith / Ashley Procopio6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAuste Joost vs Stephanie Gersbach4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJennie Ferrar / Ayse Clay vs MaryBeth Alvin / Paige Stocker6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Smith / Tatyana Safanov vs Teri Gabrys / Bethanie Spangler4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-22vs Radley Run SummerWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennie Ferrar / Ayse Clay vs Amy Posey / Susan Walter3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAuste Joost vs Elizabeth Butera4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatherine Kennedy / Kristin Hadgis vs Dana Augustine / Kelley Schorn6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristen Hipolit / Tatyana Safanov vs Nancy Jones / Wendy James2-6, 4-6
2026-07-15vs Summer OutlawsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSo Young Jang / Jane Kim vs Caryn Gargalovic / Christine Manion6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmy Benchener vs Julia Moskovitz6-3
W#2 DoublesSule Hoffman / Jennie Ferrar vs Elizabeth Carson / Lisa Young6-0, 6-3
2026-07-08vs Martins DamLost 13
L#1 DoublesAmy Benchener / Sule Hoffman vs Susie Geib / Nicole Brigham6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJulianne Mustain vs Man Lu1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAyse Clay / Katherine Kennedy vs Aileen Fletcher / Bridget Elliott4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKristen Hipolit / Tatyana Safanov vs Anne Holiday / Karen Vernisi6-4, 6-1
2026-07-01vs Summer Lovin'Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSule Hoffman / Jane Kim vs Danielle Smith / Allison Morrow3-6, 0-5
L#2 DoublesKristen Hipolit / Tatyana Safanov vs Joy Benoff / Julie Druzak2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Smith / Auste Joost vs Rachel Carmody / Janet Hopkins1-2
2026-06-24vs Serve it UpWon 40
W#1 DoublesSo Young Jang / Jane Kim vs Paige Stocker / Kelly Hagelauer6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennie Ferrar vs Ashley Procopio6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSule Hoffman / Linda Quereau vs Pamela Wight / Susan Miller6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAyse Clay / Tatyana Safanov vs Jessica Smith / Eleanor McNulty6-1, 6-0
2026-06-17vs Radley Run SummerLost 13
W#1 DoublesAmy Benchener / Sule Hoffman vs Dana Augustine / Nancy Minter6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJulianne Mustain vs Cristal Venema2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSo Young Jang / Kristen Hipolit vs Wendy James / Nancy Jones5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTatyana Safanov / Katherine Kennedy vs Jennifer Dougherty / Jocelyn Strong3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
So Young Jang
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Sule Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.02
Amy Benchener
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.96
Karla Konz
published
2.95
Jennie Ferrar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Ayse Clay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Kristin Hadgis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Linda Quereau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Katherine Kennedy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Kristen Hipolit
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.53
Tatyana Safanov
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.48
Julianne Mustain
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.33
Auste Joost
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sule Hoffman + Amy Benchener9365% games+2.9% vs expected
Tatyana Safanov + Katherine Kennedy1538% games−10.7% vs expected
Tatyana Safanov + Kristen Hipolit2349% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Kennedy + Ayse Clay3257% gamesnot enough data
Sule Hoffman + Jennie Ferrar4165% gamesnot enough data
Ayse Clay + Jennie Ferrar5077% gamesnot enough data
Linda Quereau + Sule Hoffman404 matchesnot enough data
Linda Quereau + Ayse Clay224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

So Young Jang
43W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.26
Sule Hoffman
56W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Amy Benchener
63W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Karla Konz
23W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Jennie Ferrar
33W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.95
3
Ayse Clay
39W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Kristin Hadgis
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
Linda Quereau
36W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Katherine Kennedy
40W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Kristen Hipolit
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Tatyana Safanov
56W–66L career · 6 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Julianne Mustain
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Auste Joost
30W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.