Teams

SPTC Fireballs

2025 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.0 W Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-21vs Countryside OverservedWon 10
W#2 DoublesRima Terradista / Lisa Jacome vs Debra Burwell / Barbara Turi6-2, 7-6
2025-06-14vs Innisbrook HidalgoWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Wirt / Rima Terradista vs Jeanne Lamme / Amie Rotz6-1, 6-0
2025-06-07vs McMullen PronatorsWon 10
W#2 DoublesRima Terradista / Lisa Jacome vs Mary Garrido / Maria Calderon7-5, 6-3
2025-06-01vs Seminole Lake Jordan OverservedWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Jacome / Rima Terradista vs Elizabeth Jordan / Patty Anderson7-6, 7-6
2025-05-17vs Pinellas/Bryan/40&Over3.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Jacome / Rima Terradista vs Patricia Calhoun / Heidy Rodriguez6-4, 7-5
2025-05-10vs Tarpon CoyotesWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Wirt / Rima Terradista vs Michele Sullivan / Elizabeth Tafone6-1, 6-2
2025-05-03vs SPTC Holliday 3.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesRima Terradista / Lisa Jacome vs Jane Jukes / Alisa Cromer6-1, 6-3
2025-04-26vs RCSP FaraciLost 01
L#1 DoublesRima Terradista / Bobbi-Jo Willett vs Angela Rashba / Daiva di Vito3-6, 0-6
2025-04-05vs McMullen KosarWon 10
W#1 DoublesBobbi-Jo Willett / Rima Terradista vs Melissa Foster / Karen Leary6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Sharon Miller
published
2.91
Rima Terradista
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Lisa Jacome
published
2.79
Abby Sterensis
published 3
2.79
Bobbi-Jo Willett
published 3
Jamie Connelly
published 3
2.75
Kelly Bernish
published
2.74
Suzanne D'Aquin
published
2.71
Kimberly Fiorino
published
Jane Graham
published
Melissa Wirt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bobbi-Jo Willett + Kelly Bernish303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Miller
69W–52L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Rima Terradista
65W–66L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.91
Lisa Jacome
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Abby Sterensis
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Bobbi-Jo Willett
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Jamie Connelly
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Bernish
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.75
Suzanne D'Aquin
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
Kimberly Fiorino
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
Jane Graham
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Wirt
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.