Teams

KC-CC BLUE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesDuncan Browne / Daniel Fleshner vs Jason Akers / Jonathan Young6-3, 6-1
2024-08-27vs PH BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn McGowan / Thomas Lich vs MICHAEL GUTIERREZ / Jeff Kesselman4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPat Corbitt / Duncan Browne vs Tom Kimball / William Licko2-6, 2-6
2024-08-20vs BM REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesHal Mandler / Thomas Lich vs Ian Campbell / Trent Sears4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-20vs CK REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Lich / Mark Oshman vs Aaron Merritt / Aksh T Patel2-6, 2-6
2024-08-06vs KC-RH YELLOWWon 10
W#1 SinglesDuncan Browne vs Damon Judd6-2, 6-4
2024-07-30vs GR ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Lich / Hal Mandler vs Chris Crippen / Brett Linscott3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-07-23vs CCC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesDuncan Browne / Thomas Lich vs Jonathan Moore / Burt Katubig6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Daniel Fleshner
published 3.5
3.39
Mark Oshman
published
3.37
Duncan Browne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
John McGowan
published
3.10
Thomas Lich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Hal Mandler
published
Kele Evans
published
Luke Sturges
published
Pat Corbitt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Fleshner + Thomas Lich314 matchesnot enough data
Pat Corbitt + Luke Sturges033 matchesnot enough data
John McGowan + Daniel Fleshner303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Fleshner
21W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Mark Oshman
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Duncan Browne
104W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
John McGowan
24W–27L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Thomas Lich
61W–81L career · 5 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Hal Mandler
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kele Evans
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Luke Sturges
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pat Corbitt
4W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.