Teams

Fair Oaks

2025 55 & OVER WEEKEND WOMEN · 9.0 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 4.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-09vs JNCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Alvarez / Jan Straus vs Kathy Uriarte / Beth Hittle6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPam Gandy / Nancy Price vs Fawn Cougot / Brigette Beavers7-5, 6-2
2025-02-09vs JNCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Alvarez / Holly Perry vs Fawn Cougot / Cindy Quigley6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Wooster / Jan Straus vs Kathy Uriarte / Gina Agurcia6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPam Gandy / Nancy Price vs Susanna Harrison / Brigette Beavers6-0, 6-1
2025-02-03vs JNCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Price / Julie Alvarez vs Susanna Harrison / Gina Agurcia6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPam Gandy / Jan Straus vs Fawn Cougot / Brigette Beavers6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.68
Julie Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Courtney Mayer
published 4.5
4.15
Linda Wooster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Melody DuPerier
published
4.00
Pam Gandy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.96
Denise Krupa
published 4.5
3.93
Allyson McCale
published 4
Gretchen Grover
published
Jan Straus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Wooster + Pam Gandy4647% games−7.7% vs expected
Pam Gandy + Melody DuPerier213 matchesnot enough data
Pam Gandy + Julie Alvarez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Alvarez
22W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
4.68
4.5
Courtney Mayer
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
Linda Wooster
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
4.15
Melody DuPerier
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.05
Pam Gandy
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
4.5
Denise Krupa
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.96
4
Allyson McCale
17W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
Gretchen Grover
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jan Straus
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.