Teams

LRNE- Neufeld-Hamm/LNRSC

2025 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Men 3.0 Sunday

14 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-18vs LJTH-Theisen/NMPLost 01
L#4 DoublesSam Russell / Steve Lawson vs Steve Riddle / Neil McLean7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2025-05-04vs LTPO-Powell/Westport_40+SpringLost 01
L#3 DoublesBriton Ryan / Steve Lawson vs Jeff Williford / Scott Edgar3-6, 1-6
2025-04-27vs LAFE-Feinberg/Jetton Hot ShotsWon 10
W#3 DoublesJim Staley / Steve Lawson vs Harrell Solomon / Trey Ruff4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-04-13vs LJTH-Theisen/NMPWon 10
W#3 DoublesScott Boyles / Steve Lawson vs Baxter Price / Neil McLean6-0, 6-0
2025-04-06vs LTPO-Powell/Westport_40+SpringLost 01
L#3 DoublesBriton Ryan / Steve Lawson vs Scott Edgar / Jeff Williford4-6, 2-6
2025-03-30vs LAFE-Feinberg/Jetton Hot ShotsWon 10
W#4 DoublesBriton Ryan / Steve Lawson vs John Holtz / Sam Yin7-5, 7-5
2025-03-16vs LTPO-Powell/Westport_40+SpringLost 01
L#3 DoublesBriton Ryan / Steve Lawson vs Jeff Williford / Todd Wulfhorst5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Richard Langone
published
2.93
Steve Lawson
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #4 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.90
David Thome
published 3
2.88
Paxton Thurman
published
2.78
Briton Ryan
published 3
2.75
Drew Porcello
published
2.75
Charlie Kosior
published 3
2.64
Scott Boyles
published
2.53
Ralph Emlong
published
2.49
Ryan Neufeld
published
2.48
Mark Hamm
published
2.35
Sam Russell
published
2.06
Billy Bonham
published 2.5
Kevin Feighery
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Lawson + Briton Ryan224 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Neufeld + Scott Boyles033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Langone
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Steve Lawson
36W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
David Thome
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Paxton Thurman
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Briton Ryan
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Drew Porcello
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Charlie Kosior
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Scott Boyles
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Ralph Emlong
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Ryan Neufeld
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Mark Hamm
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.48
Sam Russell
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
2.5
Billy Bonham
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Kevin Feighery
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.