Teams

Sarasota/Casanova/18&Over4.0M

2023 Sarasota Adult 18 & Over Spring Weekend · 4.0 M Saturday

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-24vs SSC Ross Men 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesJonathan Cranos / Antonio Nicolini vs Tim Mihm / Jay Belodoff1-6, 6-4
2023-06-10vs SSC Weitzel Men 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJonathan Cranos / Marc Neville vs Peter Laughlin / Felipe Soto3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesJonathan Cranos / Jim Fiumefreddo vs Jay Belodoff / Thomas Schlender6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-20vs SSC Weitzel Men 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesJonathan Cranos / Antonio Nicolini vs Barney Akierman / Lance Schilling6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-05-13vs SSC Weitzel Men 4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJonathan Cranos / Larry Denyes vs Calvin Hac / Nate Macksey5-7, 2-6
2023-04-15vs SSC Ross Men 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJonathan Cranos / Steven Paley vs Jay Belodoff / Gustavo Risquez7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Gaston Gonzalez
published
3.81
Jim Fiumefreddo
published
3.81
Marc Pommainville
published
3.79
Kent Perry
published
Antonio Nicolini
published 4
David Arrowood
published 4
3.73
Ross Williamson
published
3.68
Jonathan Cranos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Joseph Casanova
published
3.64
Larry Denyes
published
Steven Paley
published
Thiago Domingues
published
Wayne Osher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Cranos + Antonio Nicolini3347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gaston Gonzalez
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
Jim Fiumefreddo
9W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Marc Pommainville
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Kent Perry
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Antonio Nicolini
15W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
David Arrowood
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ross Williamson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Jonathan Cranos
23W–25L career · 6 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Joseph Casanova
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Larry Denyes
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Steven Paley
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thiago Domingues
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wayne Osher
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.