Teams

Holstein/Daly (DAY)

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 55 & OVER · WOMEN 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-05vs Mika/Laico 2025 (day)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Daly / Diana Moore vs Ann Boser / Betty Burke6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSandy Cissel / Pam Perkins vs Karen Rios / Debbie Reed6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Hughes / Kimberly Sheahan vs JoAnna Mika / Judith Laico6-3, 6-2
2025-04-05vs Cottington/WallingWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiana Moore / Pam Perkins vs Caroline Quinn-Alger / Darci Buchanan6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCatherine Holstein / Lisa Daly vs Kelly Kocor / Kathleen Adams6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Hughes / Gail Conklin vs Loraine Beinhart / Barbara Burke6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Pam Perkins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Diana Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Lisa Daly
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Sandy Cissel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Donna O'Meara
published
2.86
Dawn McKenna
published 3
2.83
Catherine Holstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Heather Michael
published
2.79
Gail Conklin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Carolyn Power
published 3
2.68
Kimberly Sheahan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Cheryl Holland
published 3
2.32
Susan Doyle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Daly + Pam Perkins4161% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Power + Heather Michael123 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Holstein + Dawn McKenna303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam Perkins
16W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
3.5
Diana Moore
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Lisa Daly
19W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Sandy Cissel
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Donna O'Meara
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Dawn McKenna
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Catherine Holstein
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Heather Michael
10W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Gail Conklin
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Carolyn Power
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Kimberly Sheahan
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
3
Cheryl Holland
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Susan Doyle
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.