Teams

GRETA 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Women 40 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-26vs Milani 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Stewart / Michelle Shubert vs Ginger Ballard / Allison Peters0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLorie Aiken / Heather Barber vs Catherine Johnstone / Lisa Sullivan6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAshleigh Corthum / Selena West vs Kathleen Mattacola / Tori Swanson2-6, 1-6
2026-08-19vs Dixon 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Stewart / Teri MacDonald Cadieux vs Radha Singh / Mary Catherine Hartley4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAllyson Wood / Michelle Shubert vs Karen Hardesty / Jennifer Page0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristi Womble / Heather Barber vs Kathryn Thill / Teresa Gaskin3-6, 4-6
2026-08-12vs Busch 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesLorie Aiken / Selena West vs Shannon Smith / Susan Barnes4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAshleigh Corthum / Brittney Obrien vs Spring Walsh / Leslie Patterson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristi Womble / Heather Barber vs Angela Olalere / Lyndsey Grubb6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.58
Selena West
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Lorie Aiken
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.53
Brittney Obrien
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.51
Ashleigh Corthum
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.48
Christi Womble
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.38
Allyson Wood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.31
Teri MacDonald Cadieux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.89
Michelle Shubert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorie Aiken + Ashleigh Corthum2445% games+4.7% vs expected
Brittney Obrien + Selena West4353% games+4.2% vs expected
Lorie Aiken + Selena West123 matchesnot enough data
Ashleigh Corthum + Allyson Wood123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Selena West
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
2.58
Lorie Aiken
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
2.5
Brittney Obrien
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%42%58%
2.53
3
Ashleigh Corthum
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Christi Womble
12W–21L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
3
Allyson Wood
15W–24L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
Teri MacDonald Cadieux
3W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.31
Michelle Shubert
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.