Teams

Collins-2.5-Tatum

2026 Mixed 18&Over-PB · 2.5 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-09vs Holcomb 2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bishop / Kyle Wallace vs Kayla Holcomb / Nate Oswalt3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMary Kathryn Burge / Jeremy Burge vs Kaytlin Benzel / Tyler Mcclellan2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Bynum / Tim Bynum vs Bayley Alexander / Adam Reynolds3-6, 0-6
2026-06-30vs Holcomb 2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTim Bynum / Lauren Bynum vs Jonathan King / Kaytlin Benzel0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKyle Wallace / Jennifer Bishop vs Adam Reynolds / Wilhelmina Jarvis2-6, 1-6
2026-06-11vs Holcomb 2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKyle Wallace / Jennifer Bishop vs Jonathan King / Amanda Hanson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTim Bynum / Lauren Bynum vs Jason Brown / Wilhelmina Jarvis1-6, 1-6
2026-06-02vs Holcomb 2.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRussell Andrus / Samantha Andrus vs Henry Van / Kayla Holcomb1-6
L#2 DoublesTim Bynum / Lauren Bynum vs Adam Reynolds / Bayley Alexander0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKyle Wallace / Jennifer Bishop vs Jason Brown / Jenny Green6-7, 6-7
2026-05-28vs Holcomb 2.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bishop / Kyle Wallace vs Kayla Holcomb / Nate Oswalt2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Kathryn Burge / Jeremy Burge vs Amanda Hanson / Adam Reynolds0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLauren Bynum / Tim Bynum vs Kaytlin Benzel / Jason Brown1-6, 0-6
2026-05-19vs Holcomb 2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLauren Bynum / Tim Bynum vs Kayla Holcomb / Henry Van4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Bishop / Kyle Wallace vs Bayley Alexander / Adam Reynolds3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.55
Bettie Collins
published 3
2.23
Mary Kathryn Burge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Jeremy Burge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Samantha Andrus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.01
Kyle Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.87
Lauren Bynum
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tim Bynum
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Bynum + Tim Bynum0616% gamesnot enough data
Mary Kathryn Burge + Jeremy Burge123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bettie Collins
14W–35L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Mary Kathryn Burge
9W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Jeremy Burge
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Samantha Andrus
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Kyle Wallace
0W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Lauren Bynum
0W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Tim Bynum
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.