Teams

TOC.Jonnalagadda

2023 CTRL Fall Singles 40 & Over · Fall Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-05Won 20
W#1 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-25Won 30
W#1 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Pradip Patel6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs Madana Galla6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-07vs TOC.HorowitzWon 21
W#1 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs Jamie Huang6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs Jonathan Inman6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesPankaj Nawal vs Michael Wood6-7, 4-6
2023-10-24vs TOC.SalianLost 02
L#1 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs Vivek Singh3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesPankaj Nawal vs Naga Mahesh Desu2-6, 2-6
2023-10-03Split 11
W#1 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Jonathan Inman6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesPankaj Nawal vs Mohammed Dessouky4-6, 4-6
2023-09-26vs TOC.SteetLost 01
L#1 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs John Nealis3-6, 2-6
2023-09-19vs TOC.SalianLost 02
L#2 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs Vivek Singh7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesPankaj Nawal vs Mahesh Salian3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Kiran Ramaswamy
usually #3 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.55
Pradeep Hariharan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.46
Pankaj Nawal
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Nitni Agrawal
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pradeep Hariharan + Nitni Agrawal314 matchesnot enough data
Kiran Ramaswamy + Pankaj Nawal314 matchesnot enough data
Nitni Agrawal + Kiran Ramaswamy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kiran Ramaswamy
178W–127L career · 7 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Pradeep Hariharan
197W–108L career · 4 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Pankaj Nawal
66W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Nitni Agrawal
210W–123L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.