Teams

ROLLING HILLS 18AW3.5A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.45 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
3.80
Laura Hoppe
published
Catherine Diego
published 4
3.70
Martina Hamamjian
published
3.43
Stacey Clemenceau
published
3.42
Jennifer Anakar
published
3.31
Alaina Thompson
published 3.5
3.26
Care Pittman
published 3.5
3.26
Jonell Langley
published
3.23
Kristine Banton
published
3.16
Tricia Hulsey
published 3.5
3.16
Chris Homen
published 3.5
2.97
Ann Gors
published 3.5
2.95
Karen Leech
published
2.75
Dolores Roque
published 3
2.71
Dana Gray
published 3
2.61
Betty Rasmussen
published 3
Mina Solemani
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristine Banton + Karen Leech5648% games−6.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ariadile Goes Mariano
15W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
Laura Hoppe
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%1%99%
3.80
4
Catherine Diego
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Martina Hamamjian
12W–16L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Stacey Clemenceau
21W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
Jennifer Anakar
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Alaina Thompson
17W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Care Pittman
1W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Jonell Langley
9W–25L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Kristine Banton
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Tricia Hulsey
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Chris Homen
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Ann Gors
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
Karen Leech
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95
3
Dolores Roque
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Dana Gray
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Betty Rasmussen
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.61
Mina Solemani
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.