Teams

Gentzlers Hit Men

2026 One Doubles-Summer · 3.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-23vs HirschLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Heelan / BENJAMIN MERRIFIELD vs Steve Hirsch / Charles Taylor4-6, 1-6
2026-07-19vs The Unforced ErrorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesTodd Gentzler / RJ Widrow vs Randahl Wilson / Nathan Rettke2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-18vs MunozLost 01
L#1 DoublesBENJAMIN MERRIFIELD / George Ramirez vs Lupe Gonzales / Nicholas Kelly1-6, 0-6
2026-07-07vs STAC MenLost 01
L#1 DoublesGeorge Ramirez / RJ Widrow vs Michael Harn / Jonathan Fischer2-6, 1-6
2026-07-05vs DeVoreLost 01
L#1 DoublesTodd Gentzler / Michael Heelan vs Scott Baird / Michael Devore4-6, 3-6
2026-07-03vs Artman/BaileyLost 01
L#1 DoublesGeorge Ramirez / Todd Gentzler vs Aaron Artman / Christopher Bailey1-6, 2-6
2026-07-01vs Hewitt-MonsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesTodd Gentzler / RJ Widrow vs Stephen Hewitt / Scott Monson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-23vs Wald MurlessWon 10
W#1 DoublesRJ Widrow / George Ramirez vs Brian Wald / Jeremiah Murlless7-6, 6-3
2026-06-18vs TLTC Kunz/WadeLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Heelan / George Ramirez vs Chad Adams / James Matteucci0-6, 0-6
2026-06-16vs Flying FingersLost 01
L#1 DoublesGeorge Ramirez / Michael Heelan vs Andrew Ta / Tim Nguyen5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
RJ Widrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
George Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
BENJAMIN MERRIFIELD
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Todd Gentzler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.00
Michael Heelan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

RJ Widrow + Todd Gentzler4448% games+0.6% vs expected
George Ramirez + RJ Widrow7353% games+0.5% vs expected
RJ Widrow + BENJAMIN MERRIFIELD101348% games−1.2% vs expected
Michael Heelan + Todd Gentzler0630% games−10.1% vs expected
George Ramirez + BENJAMIN MERRIFIELD3451% games−12.8% vs expected
George Ramirez + Todd Gentzler033 matchesnot enough data
Michael Heelan + BENJAMIN MERRIFIELD033 matchesnot enough data
BENJAMIN MERRIFIELD + Todd Gentzler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
RJ Widrow
73W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
George Ramirez
63W–85L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
3
BENJAMIN MERRIFIELD
35W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Todd Gentzler
25W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
2.5
Michael Heelan
5W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.