Teams

PH GREEN

2023 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

8 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-29vs KC-RH ORANGELost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Fahey / Merly Utsler vs Lori Galyk / Rachel Osborne7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-22vs NJ PINKSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMerly Utsler vs Allison Stankiewicz2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Fahey / Abigail Smith vs Dede Jones / Valerie Martin6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-15vs BM BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Attwood / Meshach Rhoades vs Jennifer Moxon / Dawn Cominsky6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAbigail Smith / Tara Wolfe vs Adrienne Bivens / Rhonda Milligan4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-04-08vs NJ REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Attwood / Abigail Smith vs Sarah Weill / Kathleen Gerbino4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Fahey / Merly Utsler vs Nina Miranda / Tamara Cook3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-04-01vs KC-RH BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Attwood / Meshach Rhoades vs Erica Smith / Christi Hursta6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAbigail Smith / Merly Utsler vs Nathalia Urbano / Michelle Butzke2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Jennifer Fahey
published
2.97
Marla Schroeder
published
2.92
Abigail Smith
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Merly Utsler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.77
Amy Attwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Tara Wolfe
published
Christine Bye
published 2.5
Meshach Rhoades
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marla Schroeder + Abigail Smith314 matchesnot enough data
Abigail Smith + Jennifer Fahey224 matchesnot enough data
Marla Schroeder + Amy Attwood213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Attwood + Merly Utsler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Fahey
27W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
2.99
Marla Schroeder
28W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.97
3
Abigail Smith
104W–86L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Merly Utsler
45W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Amy Attwood
83W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Tara Wolfe
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.52
2.5
Christine Bye
2W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meshach Rhoades
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.