Teams

MLBKU-Kumar/PAC

2024 Lake 55 & Over Mixed Doubles · Mixed 4.0 Mon pm 55

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-08-12vs MLABR-Brandon/LNRC 55+ 4.0 MXSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTom McElhenny / Suzanne Davis vs Michael di Benedictis / Kim Molke6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDerek Heicken / Jennifer Jenkins vs Tammy McGahan / Norm Marttila6-3, 6-2
2024-08-05vs MLLAL-Altamura JettonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesOdette Baker / Derek Heicken vs Alison Siebold / Kurt Thielemann6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Nilson / Tom McElhenny vs Mary Jones / Ronald Bruce6-3, 6-4
2024-07-22vs MLFO-Foreman/LNRCLost 02
L#1 DoublesTom McElhenny / Suzanne Davis vs Louis Foreman / Elizabeth Foreman7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDerek Heicken / Elisa Propst vs Charles Zylstra / Nancy Zylstra6-7, 1-6
2024-07-15vs MLLP-Pate/Bailey Road 55+ 4.0 MXWon 10
W#3 DoublesDerek Heicken / Odette Baker vs Jeffrey Hornock / LuAnne Pate6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-01vs MLLAL-Altamura JettonLost 01
L#3 DoublesDerek Heicken / Odette Baker vs Ronald Bruce / Lin Altamura0-6, 1-6
2024-06-24vs MLABR-Brandon/LNRC 55+ 4.0 MXWon 10
W#2 DoublesTom McElhenny / Suzanne Davis vs Scott Smith / Julie Yencer6-3, 6-3
2024-06-17vs MLFO-Foreman/LNRCLost 01
L#1 DoublesTom McElhenny / Suzanne Davis vs Louis Foreman / Elizabeth Foreman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-06-10vs MLLP-Pate/Bailey Road 55+ 4.0 MXSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Jenkins / Tom McElhenny vs Karen Dziadziola / Dave Dehn2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDerek Heicken / Suzanne Davis vs Robert Bachner / Patty Smith3-6, 6-7
2024-06-03vs MLVWE-Weber/WP 55+ MXSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTom McElhenny / Jennifer Jenkins vs Zachary Stroupe / Becky Heflin5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesElisa Propst / Derek Heicken vs Scott Darden / Jennie Carruth6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 4.0 Mon pm 55 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Bill Leonard
published 4
Christine Nilson
published 4
3.64
Tom McElhenny
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.56
Odette Baker
published
3.50
Helen Leonard
published
3.26
Jeff Lloyd
published
3.09
Derek Heicken
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.60
Becky Kumar
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bill Leonard
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
4
Christine Nilson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Tom McElhenny
70W–57L career · 7 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.64
Odette Baker
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Helen Leonard
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Jeff Lloyd
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Derek Heicken
33W–89L career · 7 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Becky Kumar
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.