Teams

IAWC/DiLeo/Mid-TriM

2025 Iowa Tri-Level League · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Men (East)

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-14vs YawalkarWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrad DiLeo / Thies Kolln vs Sachin Yawalkar / Rolando Sanchez6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPranav Puri / Nicholas Schnicker vs Mark Breheny / Sean Donovan6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNathan Harmon / David Hu vs Steven Nesteby / Paolo Marilim6-1, 7-6
2025-07-07vs YawalkarWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrad DiLeo / David Dileo vs Garrett Ellard / Rolando Sanchez6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSeth Boysen / Nicholas Schnicker vs Ruitao Liu / Kenny Lee6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesFrank Dileo / Jake Flanders vs Ryan Geerts / Steven Nesteby4-6, 3-6
2025-06-30vs YawalkarWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrad DiLeo / David Dileo vs Sachin Yawalkar / Mark Breheny6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSeth Boysen / Nicholas Schnicker vs Steven Nesteby / Rolando Sanchez6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesFrank Dileo / Daniel Huff vs Ryan Geerts / Paolo Marilim6-7, 6-7
2025-06-16vs YawalkarWon 21
W#1 DoublesThies Kolln / Daniel Jones vs Sachin Yawalkar / Sam Koeppl6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSeth Boysen / Pranav Puri vs Garrett Ellard / Rolando Sanchez6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesFrank Dileo / Yuya Hagiwara vs Steven Nesteby / Paolo Marilim2-6, 5-7
2025-06-02vs YawalkarWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrad DiLeo / Daniel Jones vs Sachin Yawalkar / Sean Donovan6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPranav Puri / Nicholas Schnicker vs Kenny Lee / Ruitao Liu6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavid Hu / Yuya Hagiwara vs Ryan Geerts / Paolo Marilim3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5-4.0-4.5 Men (East) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Dileo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Brad DiLeo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Thies Kolln
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Seth Boysen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Daniel Huff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Nathan Harmon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Jake Flanders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Frank Dileo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nicholas Schnicker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Pranav Puri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Yuya Hagiwara
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Dileo
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Brad DiLeo
21W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
Thies Kolln
48W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.88
Seth Boysen
12W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81
3.5
Daniel Huff
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Nathan Harmon
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jake Flanders
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Frank Dileo
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicholas Schnicker
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pranav Puri
8W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yuya Hagiwara
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.