Teams

Hot Shots

2025 KS 18 & Over Adult Indoor League · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.79 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-03-16vs Kruse-ThoeleLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiana Tillison / Keiteyana Parks vs Danielle Kruse / Michelle Schulte6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTheresa Devlin / Charissa Evans vs Jodi Blair / Angela Kim7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-16vs Kruse-ThoeleLost 03
L#1 DoublesKeiteyana Parks / Theresa Devlin vs Kareem Thomas / Jodi Blair1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDiana Tillison vs Melissa Urich5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCharissa Evans / Kim Ritchie vs Michelle Schulte / Angela Kim6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-09vs KS/Orme/Trout/18&Over3.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesKeiteyana Parks / Christy Youngers vs Alyssa Moeller / Emily Healy0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNikki McCoy / Carole Ryan vs Denise Delcore / Courtney Darrah0-6, 0-6
2025-03-09vs KS/Orme/Trout/18&Over3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesNicolette Denney / Amber Wilson vs Julie Gentile / Denise Delcore2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLori MacKinney vs Jennifer Sebits1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKim Ritchie / Charissa Evans vs Marna Orme / Julie Trout1-6, 5-7
2025-03-02vs Bulnes-SalinaLost 02
L#1 DoublesNicolette Denney / Leila Loomis vs Tracy Herzog / Nicole Hasch0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNikki McCoy / Christy Youngers vs Bailee Norton / Taylor Gallagher2-6, 0-6
2025-03-02vs Bulnes-SalinaLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmber Wilson / Rosanne Greene vs Nicole Hasch / Taylor Gallagher0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCharissa Evans / Carole Ryan vs Bailee Norton / Tracy Herzog0-6, 0-6
2025-02-16vs Cowan/Vetter-CrestviewLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharissa Evans / Nicolette Denney vs DENISE OBR / Jo Feldman0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAlexandra Ahumada Palma vs Michelle Albracht0-6, 0-6
2025-02-16vs Cowan/Vetter-CrestviewLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Ahumada Palma / Amber Wilson vs Gaylene Alderson / Shelley Young1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDiana Tillison vs Shannon Krall0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKeiteyana Parks / Lori MacKinney vs Andrea Baalmann / Kelly Wood0-6, 5-7
2025-01-26vs Strathman-TCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharissa Evans / Rosanne Greene vs Alison Dohrman / Megan Miles1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDiana Tillison vs Jordan Cain3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeila Loomis / Theresa Devlin vs Abby Strathman / Siena Boiteau1-6, 2-6
2025-01-26vs Strathman-TCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharissa Evans / Diana Tillison vs Alison Dohrman / Aida Zulueta0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRosanne Greene / Leila Loomis vs Jordan Cain / Megan Miles2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alyssa Miller
published 3
Amber Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Charissa Evans
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 3
2.74
Patricia Thompson
published
2.67
Diana Tillison
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.53
Leila Loomis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.25
Kim Ritchie
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Alexandra Ahumada Palma
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Carole Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Christy Youngers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.11
Rosanne Greene
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.89
Theresa Devlin
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Keiteyana Parks
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lori MacKinney
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nicolette Denney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nikki McCoy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosanne Greene + Charissa Evans1435% games−7.6% vs expected
Kim Ritchie + Charissa Evans1440% gamesnot enough data
Theresa Devlin + Charissa Evans224 matchesnot enough data
Rosanne Greene + Carole Ryan123 matchesnot enough data
Carole Ryan + Charissa Evans123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alyssa Miller
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amber Wilson
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Charissa Evans
22W–37L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Thompson
81W–68L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Diana Tillison
21W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Leila Loomis
5W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%41%59%
2.53
Kim Ritchie
19W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Alexandra Ahumada Palma
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Carole Ryan
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Christy Youngers
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosanne Greene
21W–45L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Theresa Devlin
10W–20L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Keiteyana Parks
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori MacKinney
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicolette Denney
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nikki McCoy
7W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.