Teams

Kimball Farms (Jamie Escoe)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Fong Huang)

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Fong Huang) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Michelle Presley
published
3.93
Leigh Coyle
published
3.87
Linda Roeder
published
3.85
3.77
Julie Lipstein
published
3.75
Karen Wong
published
3.73
Molly Hazzis
published
3.70
Andrea Bixler
published 4
3.60
Michelle Wilkinson
published
3.59
Kitty Ku
published
3.53
Jamie Escoe
published
3.52
Chrissy Patel
published 4
3.08
Cathy Patterson
published 3.5
Holly Knight
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Coyle + Linda Roeder361757% games+5.0% vs expected
Jamie Escoe + Chrissy Patel5550% games+1.5% vs expected
Cathy Patterson + Kitty Ku213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Presley
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
Leigh Coyle
41W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Linda Roeder
40W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Chanel van Reenen
17W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.85
Julie Lipstein
24W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Karen Wong
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Molly Hazzis
29W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Andrea Bixler
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Michelle Wilkinson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Kitty Ku
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Jamie Escoe
22W–16L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Chrissy Patel
31W–27L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Cathy Patterson
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Holly Knight
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.