Teams

KLoor/ACheek (Park Road)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-18vs KLull (Bridgehampton)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLeslie Culbertson / Kate Loor vs Amy Eberhardt / Shannon Lind6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSherry Joseph / Karie Greathouse vs Julie Butkovich / Helen Wood5-7, 2-6
2022-04-29vs DShealy/TRand (Firethorne)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKarie Greathouse / Leslie Culbertson vs Jennifer Voci / Robin Johnson6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-22vs VWade (Springfield)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKate Loor / Amanda Cheek vs Amy Wiethoff / Volree Wade6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJane Tanner / Amy Rottman vs Julie Swanson / CHRISTI DEWAELE3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-15vs TMacuga/JGraham (Park Crossing)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSherry Joseph / Karie Greathouse vs Tish Macuga / Jaime Graham3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Rottman / Kate Loor vs Tatiana Thomas / Andrea Kummer7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-08vs SPurdy (Carmel)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKarie Greathouse / Bernice Cutler vs Courtney Reichs Mixon / Erin Conklin7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2022-03-25vs CMondshane (Lifetime)Won 10
W#1 DoublesBernice Cutler / Karie Greathouse vs Toni Escuder / Debra Holland6-4, 6-3
2022-03-11vs BTobia (Brookhaven)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKate Loor / Amanda Cheek vs Claudia Ridley / Kimberly Stafford7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMegan Butterly / Amy Rottman vs Molly Tucker / Hollis Marek6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-03-04vs AReynolds (CSRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBernice Cutler / Kate Loor vs Renee Foster / Pam Tan5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Engel / Karie Greathouse vs Amy Ingalls / Kristen Ziemer3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Melanie Freeman
published
3.29
Amanda Cheek
published 3.5
3.19
Bernice Cutler
published 3.5
2.95
Karie Greathouse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Kate Loor
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.90
Julie Strack
published
2.79
Vicki King
published
2.71
Amy Rottman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Loor + Amanda Cheek4255% games+4.2% vs expected
Bernice Cutler + Karie Greathouse3845% games−6.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Freeman
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Amanda Cheek
32W–44L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Bernice Cutler
15W–29L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Karie Greathouse
67W–82L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Kate Loor
50W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
Julie Strack
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.90
Vicki King
14W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Amy Rottman
30W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.