Teams

Smead/Knoxville

2026 Combo 55 & Over- Knoxville · 6.5 Combo Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 15 6:15 PM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
Sep 20 1:00 PM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
Sep 27 1:00 PM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
Oct 4 1:00 PM
West Hills Tennis Center
2026-08-30vs Uhlenhake/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLOURDES BLANDINO / Joy Benson vs Yoko Umezawa / Maggie Reynolds3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCindi Mooney / Marcia Bates vs Tammy Shrivalle / Darcy Hoffman2-6, 3-6
2026-08-16vs Wentz/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesLOURDES BLANDINO / Debbie Bryant vs Deborah Szwarc / Helena Liuag6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPamela Shirley / Joy Benson vs Nancy Wentz / Mary Vineyard6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Collins / LISA PETTY vs Helen Ericson / Olga Sokolov2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
LOURDES BLANDINO
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Pamela Shirley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Jennifer Collins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Wendi Arnold
published
3.20
Debra Chaniott
published 3
3.16
Cindi Mooney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Angie Goodwyn
published 3.5
2.80
Linda Dayringer
published
2.74
Joy Benson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
LISA PETTY
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Marcia Bates
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Emily Smead
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Collins + Angie Goodwyn6167% games+13.9% vs expected
Angie Goodwyn + Wendi Arnold6457% games+4.8% vs expected
Linda Dayringer + Debra Chaniott5351% games−2.5% vs expected
Jennifer Collins + Wendi Arnold314 matchesnot enough data
Angie Goodwyn + LOURDES BLANDINO404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

LOURDES BLANDINO
36W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Pamela Shirley
19W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Jennifer Collins
28W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
Wendi Arnold
27W–12L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3
Debra Chaniott
10W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
3.5
Cindi Mooney
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Angie Goodwyn
40W–20L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Linda Dayringer
11W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
Joy Benson
27W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
LISA PETTY
8W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
Marcia Bates
14W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Emily Smead
11W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.