Teams

ELindblom-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · 55 & Over Combo 7.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.79 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 9 6:30 PM
UNC Faculty Staff Recreation Association
Sep 16 8:00 PM
Chapel Hill Tennis Club Inc
Sep 23 8:00 PM
Hollow Rock Racquet Club
Sep 30 6:30 PM
Rock Quarry Tennis Courts
Oct 7 6:30 PM
Whippoorwill Park
2026-09-02vs NBuckley-HRWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Noga / David Holub vs William Lillard / David Grose7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJeff Reedy / Dave Michelman vs Michael Shachtman / Jeffrey Qualls6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEric Lindblom / Charles Bishop vs Eddie Blount / Niall Buckley6-2, 6-0
2026-08-26vs GGlish-CHTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrian Noga / David Holub vs Randy Cubrilovic / BRYAN WRIGHT7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCharles Bishop / Mark Stone vs Wendell Gilland / Adam Strom2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEric Lindblom / JAMES MONTAGUE vs JOE BERTON / Bob Stocking6-4, 7-6
2026-08-19vs PBream.7.5C-UNCLost 03
L#1 DoublesEric Lindblom / Stephen Rothchild vs Remco Laan / James White3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLucas Gamero / Dave Michelman vs David Earnshaw / Michael Meyers0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeff Reedy / Vincent Illiano vs Stephen Goldner / Chris Mansfield3-6, 2-6
2026-08-12vs NBuckley-HRWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrian Noga / JAMES MONTAGUE vs Michael Shachtman / Chris Sansone6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPhil Korest / Ed Holub vs Jeffrey Qualls / Eddie Blount6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephen Rothchild / Lucas Gamero vs Greg Duncan / Michael Spears7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 55 & Over Combo 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PBream.7.5C-UNC2051446
2ELindblom-DUR1124851

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Brian Noga
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Eric Lindblom
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Jeff Reedy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Phil Korest
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Ed Holub
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Lucas Gamero
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
David Holub
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
JAMES MONTAGUE
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Vincent Illiano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Stephen Rothchild
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Charles Bishop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Dave Michelman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ed Holub + David Holub5166% games+11.8% vs expected
Jeff Reedy + Phil Korest4162% gamesnot enough data
Ed Holub + Stephen Rothchild314 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Reedy + Stephen Rothchild213 matchesnot enough data
Phil Korest + Stephen Rothchild213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Noga
62W–44L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Eric Lindblom
121W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Jeff Reedy
62W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Phil Korest
43W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Ed Holub
78W–27L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Lucas Gamero
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
David Holub
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
JAMES MONTAGUE
17W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
Vincent Illiano
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Stephen Rothchild
62W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Charles Bishop
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Dave Michelman
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.