Teams

Malaki - Faulty Logic

2025 Howard Combo Mixed · Howard Combo Mixed 9.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.33 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-04vs HocoCha9.5MXLost 01
L#1 DoublesAshley Hammons / Rodrigo Pedraza vs Meghan Damico / Luis Lozano0-6, 4-6
2025-08-16vs HocoCha9.5MXWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarta Perez Mur / Frederic Colas vs Eve Helmer / Luis Lozano7-5, 6-4
2025-08-10vs DaRosso - Matty's Baddies 9.5MXWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarta Perez Mur / Frederic Colas vs Randy Resnik / Lauren Gurney5-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Combo Mixed 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.77
Kun Teng TCHE
published
4.65
Marek Slojewski
published
4.63
Iosua Malaki
published
4.61
Matthew O'Connor
published
4.41
Anirudh Poruri
published 4.5
4.14
Sam Lieber
published
4.13
Ashley Hammons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.78
Frederic Colas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Marta Perez Mur
published
Rodrigo Pedraza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Stearman
published
Stephanie Cohen
published
Ting Pei Chang
published
Trent Russell
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kun Teng TCHE
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.77
Marek Slojewski
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.65
Iosua Malaki
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.63
Matthew O'Connor
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.61
4.5
Anirudh Poruri
10W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.41
Sam Lieber
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.14
4.5
Ashley Hammons
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
4
Frederic Colas
180W–150L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
Marta Perez Mur
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rodrigo Pedraza
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Stearman
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Cohen
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ting Pei Chang
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Trent Russell
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.