Teams

Schneiderman/Memphis

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Memphis · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-17vs Lovell/MemphisLost 01
L#3 DoublesDonna Wolfanger / Morgan Burton vs Lindsay Adams / Kelly Kitabchi1-6, 1-6
2025-07-10vs Johnson/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesCrista Mcmorran / Donna Wolfanger vs Vicki Lindsay / Kecia Coleman3-6, 2-6
2025-06-23vs Johnson/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Stratton / Tarshian Moon vs Tammy Smalley / Felicia Powell6-7, 1-6
2025-06-17vs Johnson/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesTina Schneiderman / Dana Stout vs Haden Kane / Gina Smith2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Flesch / Leslie Darling vs Mary Trotz / Sara Yarrow6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Evans / Tarshian Moon vs Olivia House / Lauren Rogers6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-12vs Campbell/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracy Pope / Donna Wolfanger vs Allison Eckelkamp / Abby Spann0-6, 6-7
2025-06-06vs Musick/MemphisLost 01
L#3 DoublesTracy Pope / Donna Wolfanger vs Kiersten Schnacke / Sara Yarrow3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Savannah Nagle
published
3.43
Donna Wolfanger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Leslie Darling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Cristi Ross
published 3.5
3.24
Tina Schneiderman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Jessica Flesch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Dana Stout
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Constance Conley
published 3
2.84
Jean Phebus
published
2.68
Tarshian Moon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Krista Tebbe
published
2.44
Susan Patrone
published
Gayla Arvin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Stout + Jessica Flesch2445% games+16.9% vs expected
Constance Conley + Krista Tebbe2349% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Darling + Dana Stout134 matchesnot enough data
Dana Stout + Tina Schneiderman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Savannah Nagle
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Donna Wolfanger
26W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Leslie Darling
22W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Cristi Ross
26W–24L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Tina Schneiderman
23W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Jessica Flesch
28W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Dana Stout
17W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
3
Constance Conley
18W–20L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Jean Phebus
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Tarshian Moon
31W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
Krista Tebbe
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Susan Patrone
18W–31L career · no lines in 2025
0%65%35%
2.44
Gayla Arvin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.