Teams

Di.Sauer55A

2024 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-29vs An.Ashburn55AWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Rowe / Diane Sauer vs Mary Cockrill / Jennifer Fogleman6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Murphy / Virgina Wilson vs Lori Bourne / Chandler Bastian6-0, 6-2
2024-04-15vs El.Osbourne55ALost 01
L#3 DoublesVirgina Wilson / Gwen Hedgepeth vs Jocelyn Badulis / Phoebe Hill1-6, 3-6
2024-04-08vs Su.Knowles55ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiane Sauer / Karen Murphy vs Sarah Schmalz / Susanne Knowles3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesVirgina Wilson / Gwen Hedgepeth vs Ann Willard / Toni Paladino6-3, 6-4
2024-04-01vs Di.Williams55A3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesKathleen Fyda-Turner / Diane Sauer vs Laurie Reiss / Theresa Rosario-Jansen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGwen Hedgepeth / Virgina Wilson vs Jessie Brinkley / Stephanie Lee4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-25vs Pa.Cochran55AWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathleen Fyda-Turner / Diane Sauer vs Ranita Airington / Mary Ann Enzweiler6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGwen Hedgepeth / Christine Rowe vs Carol Vervaert / Kim Hopkins6-2, 6-2
2024-03-11vs Di.Abourisk55AWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane Sauer / Christine Rowe vs Alacia Billow / Jamie Kerzner6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGwen Hedgepeth / Nancy Lorch vs Darlene Miller / Anne Iannucci6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-03-04vs Ca.Conzola55ALost 01
L#2 DoublesDiane Sauer / Virgina Wilson vs Lisa Kempf / Myra Peterson6-7, 2-6
2024-02-26vs Sy.Daigle55ASplit 11
W#2 DoublesDiane Sauer / Kathleen Fyda-Turner vs Susan Hembarsky / Kate Pirrung6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesGwen Hedgepeth / Kathleen Lis vs Kimberlei Gill / Peggy Dobbins4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Diane Sauer
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Christine Rowe
published 3.5
3.25
Lori Jensen
published 3.5
3.21
Virgina Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Gwen Hedgepeth
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Sauer + Virgina Wilson4355% gamesnot enough data
Gwen Hedgepeth + Virgina Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Sauer
136W–88L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
3.39
3.5
Christine Rowe
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Lori Jensen
107W–86L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
3
Virgina Wilson
50W–45L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.21
3
Gwen Hedgepeth
148W–89L career · 9 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.