Teams

Winner/Alvarez

2023 SPB Adult 18 & Over ESL Fall · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-12-12Won 20
W#1 DoublesGabriela Alvarez / Nena Rivas vs Cheryll Cheadle / Laurie Givone6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMaria Rendon / Pamela Corzo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-12-05vs Travel - Volley GirlsWon 20
W#2 DoublesGabriela Alvarez / Nena Rivas vs Daniela CASTILLO / Brenda Liz Delgado6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLoreto Carvajal / Maria Rendon vs Michanne Davidson / Cheri Tishman6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-11-28Won 10
W#2 SinglesAna Murray vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-21Won 20
W#1 DoublesGabriela Alvarez / Nena Rivas vs Lisa Carlin / Lauren Milano6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAna Murray vs Lori Curley6-0, 6-2
2022-11-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNena Rivas / Ana Ludy Garay vs Stacy Christensen / Mary Anne Kauppila6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-11-07vs Travel - Volley GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesGabriela Alvarez / Nena Rivas vs Mary Navas / Daniela Romay6-4, 6-0
2022-10-28vs Travel - Volley GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesGabriela Alvarez / Nena Rivas vs Cheri Tishman / Jessica Arnesen6-4, 6-2
2022-10-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesGabriela Alvarez / Nena Rivas vs Tracey Farrigan / Ruth Amiel - (DQ)6-1, 6-4
2022-10-03vs Royal Palm Polo - MilanoWon 10
W#1 DoublesGabriela Alvarez / Nena Rivas vs Lisa Corsa / Susan Jablonski7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Paulina Carney
published
3.78
Gabriela Alvarez
published 4
3.46
Davina Cancelliere
published 3.5
3.44
Ana Murray
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Beril Karacadag
published 3.5
3.31
Pamela Corzo
published
3.27
Nena Rivas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Maria Rendon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Robin Hayden
published
Loreto Carvajal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Rendon + Nena Rivas4158% gamesnot enough data
Maria Rendon + Ana Murray2341% gamesnot enough data
Beril Karacadag + Davina Cancelliere213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paulina Carney
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.07
4
Gabriela Alvarez
25W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
3.5
Davina Cancelliere
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Ana Murray
112W–103L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Beril Karacadag
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Pamela Corzo
20W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Nena Rivas
96W–113L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Maria Rendon
45W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Robin Hayden
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Loreto Carvajal
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.