← Teams

SJRC-Ruhsenberger

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Tim Janes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
3.06
David Floyd
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Jered Cuenco
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Lars Kasch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Gus Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Kjell Ostlund
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Charles Ruhsenberger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Dave Sasaki
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Michael Parkhurst
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
Results6 ties
2020-03-06Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesChris Parnell / Jered Cuenco vs Todd Jacobson / Steve Snyder6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMichael Parkhurst vs Christopher Marin7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Ruhsenberger / Dave Sasaki vs Thomas Bollaert / Scott Ackley6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Hochstatter / Lars Kasch vs William Maddox / Charles Martin6-1, 6-4
2020-02-23Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesChris Parnell / Dave Sasaki vs Steven Darling / Jean Pierre Belmar6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJered Cuenco vs Jack Crossen6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJason Hughes / Kjell Ostlund vs Jesse Wood / Sam Antony7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Floyd / Gus Johnson vs Tyler Grant / Kenny Wong6-2, 7-5
2020-02-15Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesCharles Ruhsenberger / David Floyd vs Michael Ogden / Ryan Owens6-0, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJered Cuenco vs Yash Vora6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJacob Boston / Gus Johnson vs Erik Bucher / Chris Olmsted6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMichael Parkhurst vs PATRICK GOTTSCH7-5, 6-1
2020-01-24Lost 0–4
L#1 SinglesJered Cuenco vs Scott Naugler6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJacob Boston / Dave Sasaki vs Andrew Kohlmetz / Chris Reich6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesDavid Floyd vs Derek Lamprecht6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLars Kasch / Michael Hochstatter vs Stephen Doubleday / Paul Ecker7-6, 7-5
2020-01-11Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesNate Kettlewell / Gus Johnson vs Tim Fernstrom / Todd Spear6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTim Janes vs Stephen Galati4-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Ruhsenberger / Dave Sasaki vs Steve Elmer / Bret Crawford7-6, 6-3
2020-01-05Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLars Kasch / Michael Hochstatter vs Brad Johnson / Jean Pierre Belmar6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJered Cuenco vs Steven Darling2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTim Janes / Jacob Boston vs Tyler Grant / Matt Savage6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Tim Janes
47W–53L career
0%18%82%
3.23
3
David Floyd
56W–37L career · type A
0%64%36%
3.06
3
Jered Cuenco
66W–83L career
0%97%3%
2.88
3
Lars Kasch
32W–61L career
2%96%2%
2.77
3
Gus Johnson
37W–29L career
not enough data
—
3
Kjell Ostlund
15W–14L career
not enough data
—
3
Charles Ruhsenberger
47W–57L career
4%96%0%
2.67
3
Dave Sasaki
21W–42L career
15%85%0%
2.60
3
Michael Parkhurst
40W–84L career
15%85%0%
2.60

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.