Teams

Duwearatchi/Ballentine 4.0 40+ W23

2023 Adult 40 & Over Winter · 4.0 Men

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-02-02vs Goodman- Swillers 40+ W23Won 10
W#2 DoublesBooshan Bharath / Paul Sariego vs David Goodman / Andrei Sivanich6-0, 6-4
2023-01-19vs Tuplano- TBCWon 10
W#2 DoublesChad Renwick / Booshan Bharath vs Per Ostlund / Dan Swanson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-01-12vs Tirado 40+ W23Won 10
W#2 DoublesBooshan Bharath / Paul Sariego vs Ryan Kadelbach / Nicholas Fisher6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Jay Knutson
published
3.86
Booshan Bharath
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Behnam Kholghi
published 4
3.83
Paul Sariego
published
3.79
Mark Matijasevich
published
3.78
Thor Nelson
published
3.78
3.78
Raj Pillai
published
Cory Kiner
published 4
Felix Diehn
published 4
3.72
Timothy Marshall
published
3.69
David Fielder
published 4
3.69
JON SCHLEY
published 4
3.52
Robert Wyly
published
3.46
Mark Gness
published
Peter Puster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Fielder + Mark Gness213 matchesnot enough data
Paul Sariego + Mark Gness213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jay Knutson
31W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Booshan Bharath
176W–107L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Behnam Kholghi
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
Paul Sariego
20W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.83
Mark Matijasevich
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
Thor Nelson
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Chandha Duwearatchi
14W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
Raj Pillai
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Cory Kiner
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Felix Diehn
1W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Timothy Marshall
32W–29L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
David Fielder
13W–19L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
JON SCHLEY
6W–16L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Robert Wyly
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.52
Mark Gness
15W–21L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
Peter Puster
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.