Teams

N OR-MV-Harlan

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Men

3 players · average NTRP 2.83 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Andrew Kullick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Hao Lee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Walter Schwane
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Results5 ties
2023-06-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHao Lee / Walter Schwane vs Jon Lavietes / Bryan LaMontagne6-0, 6-2
2023-05-20Split 11
L#1 DoublesRyan Smith / Walter Schwane vs Jeremy Harkin / David Hubka7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAli Shojania / Hao Lee vs Michael Venezia / Eric Heredia6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-14Split 11
L#1 DoublesJian Chen / Hao Lee vs Bryan LaMontagne / Kevin Franck6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWalter Schwane / Andrew Kullick vs Jon Lavietes / Michael Rounds6-2, 6-1
2023-05-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWalter Schwane / Andrew Kullick vs Patrick Rhea / Jeremy Harkin6-4, 6-1
2023-04-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesWalter Schwane / Ryan Smith vs Stephen Blum / Kenneth Powers6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Andrew Kullick
19W–14L career
0%88%12%
2.90
3
Hao Lee
23W–32L career
2%98%0%
2.74
2.5
Walter Schwane
20W–38L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.